Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
Spoken second or foreign language assessment
native language transfer effect
prominence
temporal fluency
Journal
Language and speech
ISSN: 1756-6053
Titre abrégé: Lang Speech
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985214R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
5
9
2021
medline:
28
7
2022
entrez:
4
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prosodic features are important in achieving intelligibility, comprehensibility, and fluency in a second or foreign language (L2). However, research on the assessment of prosody as part of oral proficiency remains scarce. Moreover, the acoustic analysis of L2 prosody has often focused on fluency-related temporal measures, neglecting language-dependent stress features that can be quantified in terms of syllable prominence. Introducing the evaluation of prominence-related measures can be of use in developing both teaching and assessment of L2 speaking skills. In this study we compare temporal measures and syllable prominence estimates as predictors of prosodic proficiency in non-native speakers of English with respect to the speaker's native language (L1).The predictive power of temporal and prominence measures was evaluated for utterance-sized samples produced by language learners from four different L1 backgrounds: Czech, Slovak, Polish, and Hungarian. Firstly, the speech samples were assessed using the revised Common European Framework of Reference scale for prosodic features. The assessed speech samples were then analyzed to derive articulation rate and three fluency measures. Syllable-level prominence was estimated by a continuous wavelet transform analysis using combinations of F0, energy, and syllable duration.The results show that the temporal measures serve as reliable predictors of prosodic proficiency in the L2, with prominence measures providing a small but significant improvement to prosodic proficiency predictions. The predictive power of the individual measures varies both quantitatively and qualitatively depending on the L1 of the speaker. We conclude that the possible effects of the speaker's L1 on the production of L2 prosody in terms of temporal features as well as syllable prominence deserve more attention in applied research and developing teaching and assessment methods for spoken L2.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34479458
doi: 10.1177/00238309211040175
pmc: PMC9326808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
571-597Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun;111(6):2862-73
pubmed: 12083220
Phonetica. 2006;63(4):247-67
pubmed: 17293645