Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-carious cervical lesions
Systematic review
Universal adhesives
Journal
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
ISSN: 1879-0097
Titre abrégé: Dent Mater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
24
05
2021
revised:
08
08
2021
accepted:
17
08
2021
pubmed:
6
9
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
entrez:
5
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To answer the following PICOS question: "Is the risk of retention loss, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation and postoperative sensitivity (POS) equal for etch-and-rinse (EAR) compared to self-etch (SE) or selective-enamel etch (SEE) mode when restoring non carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with universal adhesives?". PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scientific Electronic Library Online, LILACS, OpenGrey and Google Scholar™ were searched. Randomized controlled clinical trials in which resin composites and universal adhesives were used for restoration of NCCLs were considered. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using Revman; random-effects models were applied, and heterogeneity was tested using the I After screening, 20 articles were included in qualitative, while 14 articles were used for quantitative synthesis. Twelve studies ranked as "low", while 8 studies scored as "unclear" for risk of bias. At 12- and 18/24-months the risk for retention loss was higher for SE than for EAR groups (p = 0.005; RR = 0.22, 95% CI [0.08, 0.63],[moderate certainty of evidence and p = 0.0002; RR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.17, 0.58], moderate certainty of evidence, respectively). No significant differences were observed for marginal discoloration and adaptation (p > 0.05). The probability of POS occurrence was less in SE than in EAR groups (RR = 2.12, 95% CI [1.23, 3.64], moderate certainty of evidence). The certainty of evidence for other outcomes was scored as "low" or "moderate", depending on the follow-up period. Using universal adhesives in EAR or SEE mode provides more predictable retention, while SE strategy reduces the risk of POS occurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34481667
pii: S0109-5641(21)00239-6
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.017
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Dental Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e503-e521Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.