Safety and immunogenicity of different Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine formulations in two early phase randomized studies of healthy adults aged 50-85 years.

Adjuvants Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection Immunologic Nosocomial diarrhea Older adults Toxoid vaccine

Journal

Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 09 2021
Historique:
received: 17 04 2020
revised: 04 01 2021
accepted: 08 05 2021
pubmed: 7 9 2021
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 6 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Two phase 1/phase 2 studies assessed 2 formulations of investigational bivalent Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine (QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid and toxoid-alone) in healthy adults 50-85 years of age. The QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid vaccine study randomized subjects 3:1 to 100 μg QS-21-containing C difficile vaccine or placebo administered in a shortened-month (Months 0, 1, 3) or day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. The toxoid-alone vaccine study randomized subjects 3:3:1 to receive 100 or 200 μg unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stages 1 and 2 (sentinel cohorts of different age groups), and 3:1 to receive the selected dose of unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stage 3 (Days 1, 8, 30). Safety was the primary outcome for both studies. Immunogenicity was determined by measuring serum toxin A- and B-specific neutralizing antibodies. In the day regimen, 10 reports across both studies of grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 triggered predefined stopping rules. Local reactions in both studies were more common among vaccine versus placebo recipients. Injection site pain predominated and was generally mild in severity. Systemic events were infrequent and generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Adverse events were reported by 50.0%-75.0% and 16.7%-50.0% of subjects in the QS-21 and toxoid-alone studies, respectively. Immune responses peaked around Day 37 (shortened-month regimen) or between Day 15 and Month 2 (day regimen) and remained above baseline throughout follow-up. Both formulations demonstrated robust immunogenicity. Both studies stopped early due to grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 of the day regimen; neither formulation progressed to later stage development. Instead, an aluminum hydroxide-containing formulation of the vaccine candidate administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, which was safe and immunogenic in phase 1 and 2 studies, advanced to phase 3 studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Two phase 1/phase 2 studies assessed 2 formulations of investigational bivalent Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine (QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid and toxoid-alone) in healthy adults 50-85 years of age.
METHODS
The QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid vaccine study randomized subjects 3:1 to 100 μg QS-21-containing C difficile vaccine or placebo administered in a shortened-month (Months 0, 1, 3) or day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. The toxoid-alone vaccine study randomized subjects 3:3:1 to receive 100 or 200 μg unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stages 1 and 2 (sentinel cohorts of different age groups), and 3:1 to receive the selected dose of unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stage 3 (Days 1, 8, 30). Safety was the primary outcome for both studies. Immunogenicity was determined by measuring serum toxin A- and B-specific neutralizing antibodies.
RESULTS
In the day regimen, 10 reports across both studies of grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 triggered predefined stopping rules. Local reactions in both studies were more common among vaccine versus placebo recipients. Injection site pain predominated and was generally mild in severity. Systemic events were infrequent and generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Adverse events were reported by 50.0%-75.0% and 16.7%-50.0% of subjects in the QS-21 and toxoid-alone studies, respectively. Immune responses peaked around Day 37 (shortened-month regimen) or between Day 15 and Month 2 (day regimen) and remained above baseline throughout follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Both formulations demonstrated robust immunogenicity. Both studies stopped early due to grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 of the day regimen; neither formulation progressed to later stage development. Instead, an aluminum hydroxide-containing formulation of the vaccine candidate administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, which was safe and immunogenic in phase 1 and 2 studies, advanced to phase 3 studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34483022
pii: S0264-410X(21)00592-2
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.028
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacterial Vaccines 0
Toxoids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5991-6003

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Pfizer Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest All authors are employees of Pfizer Inc and may hold stock or stock options.

Auteurs

Jody Lawrence (J)

Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research & Development, 500 Arcola Rd, Collegeville, PA, USA. Electronic address: Jody.Lawrence@pfizer.com.

Nicholas Kitchin (N)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Horizon Building, Honey Lane, Hurley, Berkshire SL6 6RJ, UK.

Annaliesa S Anderson (AS)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, USA.

Michael W Pride (MW)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, USA.

Kathrin U Jansen (KU)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, USA.

William C Gruber (WC)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, USA.

Yahong Peng (Y)

Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research & Development, 500 Arcola Rd, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Kevin Yi (K)

Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Research & Development, 500 Arcola Rd, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Charles Knirsch (C)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, USA.

Chris Webber (C)

Pfizer Vaccine Research & Development, Horizon Building, Honey Lane, Hurley, Berkshire SL6 6RJ, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH