Uncertainty and Demand for Insurance: A Theoretical Model of How Self-Control Manages the Optimal Decision-Making.
consumer
decision-making
insurance
self-control
utility
willpower
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
25
04
2021
accepted:
20
07
2021
entrez:
6
9
2021
pubmed:
7
9
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the present work, we aim to mark a beginning line on the study of decision-making of potential consumers in the insurance sector, with the long-term purpose of defining the optimal cognitive processes to be undertaken when deciding whether to purchase insurance or not. Decision-making in conditions of uncertainty is influenced by the dual-self model doers/planner integrated with the hot-cold states and prospect utility function. Thus, we present a theoretical model of choice-making to evaluate the level of optimal self-control necessary to be exerted if the individual is either in the hot or in the cold state depending on the arousal. This theoretical choice-making model lays the ground for the decision journey by following the long-term utility and avoiding gross mistakes that could lead the consumer not to insure, when the odds suggest doing it, or vice versa, in situations when it would not be necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34484048
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700289
pmc: PMC8415836
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
700289Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Adamo and Malizia.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463-96
pubmed: 1099599
Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):267-86
pubmed: 11316014
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1252-65
pubmed: 9599441
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;84(3):498-510
pubmed: 12635912
Front Neurosci. 2013 Jun 10;7:104
pubmed: 23772205
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):55-73
pubmed: 12713756
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:280-283
pubmed: 32536735
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19
pubmed: 10197361
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 01;8:102
pubmed: 28203215
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):1-6
pubmed: 11892772
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82
pubmed: 21126183
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):547-54
pubmed: 10682196
Mem Cognit. 2006 Apr;34(3):589-602
pubmed: 16933768
Am Econ Rev. ;96(5):1449-76
pubmed: 29135208
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):296-309
pubmed: 12585805
Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300
pubmed: 9414606
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 12;118(2):
pubmed: 33419927
Am Econ Rev. ;94(5):1558-90
pubmed: 29068191
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 6;108(36):14998-5003
pubmed: 21876169
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 29;17(9):
pubmed: 32365710
J Soc Psychol. 1999 Aug;139(4):446-57
pubmed: 10457761
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2014;79:169-76
pubmed: 25637264