Industry Payments to Physicians and Prescribing Branded Memantine and Donepezil Combination.


Journal

Neurology. Clinical practice
ISSN: 2163-0402
Titre abrégé: Neurol Clin Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101577149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 03 01 2020
accepted: 05 03 2020
entrez: 6 9 2021
pubmed: 7 9 2021
medline: 7 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Once-daily extended-released memantine with donepezil (hereafter memantine/donepezil) may improve medication adherence but has a 60-fold higher cost compared with combined generic components. Little is known about factors associated with prescribing memantine/donepezil. We examined the association between pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Using 2015-2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and Part D prescription databases, we identified unique physicians who prescribed ≥11 memantine/donepezil prescriptions from 2015 to 2016. Outcome variable was the number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions written per physician per year. The key independent variable was physician receipt of industry payments defined in 2 models: (1) number of payments and (2) amount of payment ($100 units) for memantine/donepezil received per physician per year. Multivariable Poisson regression was used, adjusting for potential confounders. Among 4,895 unique eligible physicians in 2015-2016, the median number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions per physician per year was 19.5 (25th percentile 13, 75th percentile 32). Physicians received between 0 and 75 payments per year (median 1, 25th percentile 0, 75th percentile 2.5) for memantine/donepezil, totaling an average of $92 per year (median $10.5, 25th percentile $0, 75th percentile $33.20). Every 1 additional payment received was associated with a 2% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per year (rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.02). Every $100 increase in payment for memantine/donepezil was associated with a 0.3% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per pear (RR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004). Receipt of industry payments for memantine/donepezil was independently associated with increased likelihood of physician prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Once-daily extended-released memantine with donepezil (hereafter memantine/donepezil) may improve medication adherence but has a 60-fold higher cost compared with combined generic components. Little is known about factors associated with prescribing memantine/donepezil. We examined the association between pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians and prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare.
METHODS METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted. Using 2015-2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and Part D prescription databases, we identified unique physicians who prescribed ≥11 memantine/donepezil prescriptions from 2015 to 2016. Outcome variable was the number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions written per physician per year. The key independent variable was physician receipt of industry payments defined in 2 models: (1) number of payments and (2) amount of payment ($100 units) for memantine/donepezil received per physician per year. Multivariable Poisson regression was used, adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 4,895 unique eligible physicians in 2015-2016, the median number of memantine/donepezil prescriptions per physician per year was 19.5 (25th percentile 13, 75th percentile 32). Physicians received between 0 and 75 payments per year (median 1, 25th percentile 0, 75th percentile 2.5) for memantine/donepezil, totaling an average of $92 per year (median $10.5, 25th percentile $0, 75th percentile $33.20). Every 1 additional payment received was associated with a 2% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per year (rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.02). Every $100 increase in payment for memantine/donepezil was associated with a 0.3% increase in new memantine/donepezil prescriptions prescribed per physician per pear (RR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Receipt of industry payments for memantine/donepezil was independently associated with increased likelihood of physician prescribing memantine/donepezil in Medicare.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34484885
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000870
pii: NEURCLINPRACT2020049494
pmc: PMC8382368
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

181-187

Informations de copyright

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Références

Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):677-684
pubmed: 29909872
Neurology. 2019 May 21;92(21):1006-1013
pubmed: 31110144
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):236
pubmed: 29609611
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1114-1122
pubmed: 27322350
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Nov - Dec;12(6):815-829
pubmed: 26797263
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Oct;19(15):1711-1717
pubmed: 30244611
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 May;20(5):902-907
pubmed: 29700923
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;10(3):165-77
pubmed: 22657941

Auteurs

Zachary A Marcum (ZA)

Department of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.

Ching-Yuan Chang (CY)

Department of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.

Douglas Barthold (D)

Department of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.

Holly M Holmes (HM)

Department of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.

Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic (WH)

Department of Pharmacy (ZAM, DB), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy (C-YC, W-HL-C), Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (C-YC, W-HL-C), College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; and Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine (HMH), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School.

Classifications MeSH