Evaluation of the effect of education on perceived stress of mother candidates for amniocentesis.
Amniocentesis
education
perceived stress
Journal
Journal of education and health promotion
ISSN: 2277-9531
Titre abrégé: J Educ Health Promot
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101593794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
04
07
2020
accepted:
06
09
2020
entrez:
6
9
2021
pubmed:
7
9
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Amniocentesis is one of the methods for diagnosing prenatal abnormalities. Pregnant women with high-risk fetal screening results are the candidates for amniocentesis. Most of these women are afraid of this procedure because they predict that the test will be painful and worried about its adverse effects on pregnancy, fetal injury, or the risk of maternal death. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of education on the perceived stress of mothers who are the candidates for amniocentesis. The present study was a quasi-experimental, two-group clinical trial with a parallel design. This study was in three stages: pretest (before intervention), posttest (after intervention), and after amniocentesis. This study was performed on 80 pregnant women who were the candidates for amniocentesis (15-20 weeks of pregnancy) with high-risk fetal screening results referred to the perinatology clinic in Yazd in 2020. The intervention package included training and using breathing techniques, broadcasting educational animations on how to perform amniocentesis, expressing experiences by people who had experienced amniocentesis, and finally visiting the amniocentesis site and getting to know the relevant perinatologist. Data collection tools were demographic and midwifery profile questionnaires and Cohen perceived stress. SPSS software version 16 was used for statistical analysis of data. The results showed that the research units had high stress at the beginning of the study. The perceived stress score at the beginning of the study in the intervention group was 30.1750 ± 6.53153 and in the control group was 28.2750 ± 8.57841. After the intervention, the participants' stress level decreased below the cutting point. In the experimental group, the mean stresses after the intervention and after amniocentesis were significantly lower than before the intervention; however, after amniocentesis, it was somewhat higher than the postintervention stage. In the preintervention stage, the mean stress score between the two groups was not statistically significant. The difference after the intervention between the two groups was significant ( Considering that the perceived stress in amniocentesis candidate mothers was high in the present study, so that after performing the method, mothers left the center with high stress, it is very important to pay attention to its psychological aspects. Therefore, it is suggested that educational interventions before and during amniocentesis be considered for them along with psychological support and follow-up care after amniocentesis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Amniocentesis is one of the methods for diagnosing prenatal abnormalities. Pregnant women with high-risk fetal screening results are the candidates for amniocentesis. Most of these women are afraid of this procedure because they predict that the test will be painful and worried about its adverse effects on pregnancy, fetal injury, or the risk of maternal death. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of education on the perceived stress of mothers who are the candidates for amniocentesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The present study was a quasi-experimental, two-group clinical trial with a parallel design. This study was in three stages: pretest (before intervention), posttest (after intervention), and after amniocentesis. This study was performed on 80 pregnant women who were the candidates for amniocentesis (15-20 weeks of pregnancy) with high-risk fetal screening results referred to the perinatology clinic in Yazd in 2020. The intervention package included training and using breathing techniques, broadcasting educational animations on how to perform amniocentesis, expressing experiences by people who had experienced amniocentesis, and finally visiting the amniocentesis site and getting to know the relevant perinatologist. Data collection tools were demographic and midwifery profile questionnaires and Cohen perceived stress. SPSS software version 16 was used for statistical analysis of data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results showed that the research units had high stress at the beginning of the study. The perceived stress score at the beginning of the study in the intervention group was 30.1750 ± 6.53153 and in the control group was 28.2750 ± 8.57841. After the intervention, the participants' stress level decreased below the cutting point. In the experimental group, the mean stresses after the intervention and after amniocentesis were significantly lower than before the intervention; however, after amniocentesis, it was somewhat higher than the postintervention stage. In the preintervention stage, the mean stress score between the two groups was not statistically significant. The difference after the intervention between the two groups was significant (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Considering that the perceived stress in amniocentesis candidate mothers was high in the present study, so that after performing the method, mothers left the center with high stress, it is very important to pay attention to its psychological aspects. Therefore, it is suggested that educational interventions before and during amniocentesis be considered for them along with psychological support and follow-up care after amniocentesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34485564
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_785_20
pii: JEHP-10-267
pmc: PMC8395979
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
267Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:205-211
pubmed: 29864438
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2017 Apr-Jun;9(2):66-70
pubmed: 28496945
Singapore Med J. 2004 Aug;45(8):370-4
pubmed: 15284930
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Mar 31;9:54
pubmed: 32489989
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Aug 31;9:206
pubmed: 33062739
Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Jan;12(4):329-334
pubmed: 30291695
Prenat Diagn. 2019 May;39(6):456-463
pubmed: 30995693
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:93
pubmed: 32509901
Exp Ther Med. 2013 Feb;5(2):411-418
pubmed: 23404257
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 May;49 Suppl 1:S53-S60
pubmed: 31268571
Women Birth. 2010 Sep;23(3):111-6
pubmed: 20153992
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;286(1):63-70
pubmed: 22350327
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Jun 30;9:151
pubmed: 32766336
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:127-135
pubmed: 29730512
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 15;15:171
pubmed: 26276642
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):125-38
pubmed: 20536536