A prospective examination of sex differences in posttraumatic autonomic functioning.
Autonomic
Cardiovascular
PTSD
Sex
Trauma
Journal
Neurobiology of stress
ISSN: 2352-2895
Titre abrégé: Neurobiol Stress
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643409
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
03
05
2021
revised:
16
08
2021
accepted:
20
08
2021
entrez:
6
9
2021
pubmed:
7
9
2021
medline:
7
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cross-sectional studies have found that individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit deficits in autonomic functioning. While PTSD rates are twice as high in women compared to men, sex differences in autonomic functioning are relatively unknown among trauma-exposed populations. The current study used a prospective design to examine sex differences in posttraumatic autonomic functioning. 192 participants were recruited from emergency departments following trauma exposure ( 2-week systolic BP was significantly higher in men, while 2-week HR was significantly higher in women, and a sex by PTSD interaction suggested that women who developed PTSD demonstrated the highest HR levels. Two-week HF-HRV was significantly lower in women, and a sex by PTSD interaction suggested that women with PTSD demonstrated the lowest HF-HRV levels. Skin conductance response in the emergency department was associated with 2-week HR and HF-HRV only among women who developed PTSD. Our results indicate that there are notable sex differences in autonomic functioning among trauma-exposed individuals. Differences in sympathetic biomarkers (BP and HR) may have implications for cardiovascular disease risk given that sympathetic arousal is a mechanism implicated in this risk among PTSD populations. Future research examining differential pathways between PTSD and cardiovascular risk among men versus women is warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cross-sectional studies have found that individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit deficits in autonomic functioning. While PTSD rates are twice as high in women compared to men, sex differences in autonomic functioning are relatively unknown among trauma-exposed populations. The current study used a prospective design to examine sex differences in posttraumatic autonomic functioning.
METHODS
METHODS
192 participants were recruited from emergency departments following trauma exposure (
RESULTS
RESULTS
2-week systolic BP was significantly higher in men, while 2-week HR was significantly higher in women, and a sex by PTSD interaction suggested that women who developed PTSD demonstrated the highest HR levels. Two-week HF-HRV was significantly lower in women, and a sex by PTSD interaction suggested that women with PTSD demonstrated the lowest HF-HRV levels. Skin conductance response in the emergency department was associated with 2-week HR and HF-HRV only among women who developed PTSD.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that there are notable sex differences in autonomic functioning among trauma-exposed individuals. Differences in sympathetic biomarkers (BP and HR) may have implications for cardiovascular disease risk given that sympathetic arousal is a mechanism implicated in this risk among PTSD populations. Future research examining differential pathways between PTSD and cardiovascular risk among men versus women is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34485632
doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100384
pii: S2352-2895(21)00092-8
pmc: PMC8397921
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100384Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K23 MH125920
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : U54 MH118919
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
In the last three years GDS has received research funding from the NSF, NIH and LifeBell AI, and unrestricted donations from AliveCor, Amazon Research, the Center for Discovery, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, MathWorks, Microsoft Research, the Gates Foundation, Google, One Mind Foundation, and Samsung Research. GDS has financial interest in AliveCor and receives unrestricted funding from the company. He is also the CTO of MindChild Medical and CSO of LifeBell AI and has ownership in both companies. These relationships are unconnected to the current work. In the past three years, LTG has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Sage Bionetworks, for which she received a small honorarium. SLR reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study; personal fees from SOBP (Society of Biological Psychiatry) paid role as secretary, other from Oxford University Press royalties, other from APP (American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.) royalties, other from VA (Veterans Administration) per diem for oversight committee, and other from Community Psychiatry paid board service, including equity outside the submitted work; and Leadership roles on Board or Council for SOBP, ADAA (Anxiety and Depression Association of America), and NNDC (National Network of Depression Centers). SS has received funding from the Florida Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriter's Association Dr. Alvin E. Smith Safety of Healthcare Services Grant; Allergan Foundation; the NIH/NIA-funded Jacksonville Aging Studies Center (JAX-ASCENT; R33AG05654); and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (1H79TI083101-01); and the Florida Blue Foundation. CWJ reports no direct conflicts related to this paper. He has been an investigator on studies funded by Hologic Inc, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Vapotherm, for which his department has received research funding. JJ receives consulting payments from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Over the past three years, DAP has received consulting fees from Albright Stonebridge Group, BlackThorn Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Compass Pathway, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Engrail Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals as well as one honorarium from Alkermes. In addition, he has received stock options from BlackThorn Therapeutics, and research support from National Institute of Mental Health, Dana Foundation, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, and Millennium Pharmaceuticals. No funding from these entities was used to support the current work, and all views expressed are solely those of the authors. JME reports support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through Grant Numbers R01HD079076 & R03HD094577, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, and National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. He also reports funding from the New South Wales Health Spinal Cord Injury Research Grants Program and consulting fees (<$15,000 per annum) from Orofacial Therapeutics, LLC. In the past 3 years, RCK was a consultant for Datastat, Inc., Holmusk, RallyPoint Networks, Inc., and Sage Pharmaceuticals. He has stock options in Mirah, PYM, and Roga Sciences. KJR has received consulting income from Alkermes, research support from NIH, Genomind and Brainsway, and he is on scientific advisory boards for Janssen and Verily, all of which is unrelated to the present work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Sep;73(3):257-64
pubmed: 19374925
Psychosom Med. 2010 Nov;72(9):917-24
pubmed: 20947782
Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):585-94
pubmed: 11485112
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Oct;78(1):27-34
pubmed: 20450940
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;72(10):979-86
pubmed: 26353072
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Sep;45(9):2019-33
pubmed: 17442266
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018 Jul;93:133-141
pubmed: 29727810
Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 1;72(1):19-24
pubmed: 22502987
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Mar;25(2):209-16
pubmed: 20956066
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Dec 21;28(12):1058-66
pubmed: 21898707
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;52(12):1048-60
pubmed: 7492257
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Jan;27(1):33-46
pubmed: 23247200
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Mar;46(4):750-755
pubmed: 33318633
Am Heart J. 2013 Nov;166(5):806-14
pubmed: 24176435
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Apr;5(4):381-391
pubmed: 32033924
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 May;64:288-310
pubmed: 26964804
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2019 Jan-Dec;3:
pubmed: 31179413
Biol Psychol. 2011 Dec;88(2-3):215-22
pubmed: 21856373
Psychosom Med. 2012 Feb-Mar;74(2):153-9
pubmed: 22286850
Depress Anxiety. 2015 Dec;32(12):927-34
pubmed: 26522237
Learn Mem. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):681-5
pubmed: 17142300
J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 Nov;103(4):825-7
pubmed: 7822586
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;25(2):283-296
pubmed: 31745239
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):24-34
pubmed: 26530104
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;78(5):344-53
pubmed: 25727177
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 27;8(sup5):1353383
pubmed: 29075426
Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Mar 15;47(6):512-9
pubmed: 10715357
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Mar;71(3):264-8
pubmed: 19013485
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;55(6):553-9
pubmed: 9633675
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):185-201
pubmed: 29380817
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:195-200
pubmed: 29913378
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jun;42(7):515-20
pubmed: 18313695
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Apr;125(3):349-55
pubmed: 26866677
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Feb;62(2):695-704
pubmed: 21377482
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013 Sep;38(5):341-8
pubmed: 23611176
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):64-71
pubmed: 23107307
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;73(6):849-55
pubmed: 22687631
J Trauma Stress. 2006 Aug;19(4):461-70
pubmed: 16929502
Psychosom Med. 2014 May;76(4):292-301
pubmed: 24804881
Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Mar 1;41(5):627-9
pubmed: 9046997
Neuroscience. 2010 Jul 14;168(3):652-8
pubmed: 20412837
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Oct;26(5):537-47
pubmed: 24151000
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jan;60(1):83-90
pubmed: 16380314
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;157(2):255-61
pubmed: 10671396
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Apr 1;49(7):637-43
pubmed: 11297721
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jun;34(6):502-507
pubmed: 28221710
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391
pubmed: 26653052