Using a theory of change to develop an integrated intervention for depression, diabetes and hypertension in Zimbabwe: lessons from the Friendship Bench project.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 02 01 2021
accepted: 26 08 2021
entrez: 7 9 2021
pubmed: 8 9 2021
medline: 9 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are projected to become the leading cause of disability and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030; a vast treatment gap exists. There is a dearth of knowledge on developing evidence-based interventions that address comorbid NCDs using a task-shifting approach. The Friendship Bench, a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders delivered by trained community grandmothers, is a promising intervention for comorbid NCDs. Although task-shifting appears to be a rational approach, evidence suggests that it may bring about tension between existing professionals from whom tasks are shifted. A Theory of Change approach is an effective way of managing the unintended tension by bringing together different stakeholders involved to build consensus on how to task shift appropriately to the parties involved. We aimed to use a theory of change approach to formulating a road map on how to successfully integrate diabetes and hypertension care into the existing Friendship Bench in order to come up with an integrated care package for depression, hypertension and diabetes aimed at strengthening NCD care in primary health care systems in Zimbabwe. A theory of change workshop with 18 stakeholders from diverse backgrounds was carried out in February 2020. Participants included grandmothers working on the Friendship Bench project (n = 4), policymakers from the ministry of health (n = 2), people with lived experience for the three NCDs (n = 4), health care workers (n = 2), and traditional healers (n = 2). Findings from earlier work (situational analysis, desk review, FGDs and clinic-based surveys) on the three NCDs were shared before starting the ToC. A facilitator with previous experience running ToCs led the workshop and facilitated the co-production of the ToC map. Through an iterative process, consensus between the 18 stakeholders was reached, and a causal pathway leading to developing a framework for an intervention was formulated. The ToC singled out the need to use expert clients (people with lived experience) to promote a patient-centred care approach that would leverage the existing Friendship Bench approach. In the face of COVID-19, the stakeholders further endorsed the use of existing digital platforms, notably WhatsApp, as an alternative way to reach out to clients and provide support. Leveraging existing community support groups as an entry point for people in need of NCD care was highlighted as a win-win by all stakeholders. A final framework for an NCD care package supported by Friendship Bench was presented to policymakers and accepted to be piloted in five geographical areas. The ToC can be used to build consensus on how best to use using an existing intervention for common mental disorders to integrate care for diabetes and hypertension. There is a need to evaluate this new intervention through an adequately powered study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are projected to become the leading cause of disability and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030; a vast treatment gap exists. There is a dearth of knowledge on developing evidence-based interventions that address comorbid NCDs using a task-shifting approach. The Friendship Bench, a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders delivered by trained community grandmothers, is a promising intervention for comorbid NCDs. Although task-shifting appears to be a rational approach, evidence suggests that it may bring about tension between existing professionals from whom tasks are shifted. A Theory of Change approach is an effective way of managing the unintended tension by bringing together different stakeholders involved to build consensus on how to task shift appropriately to the parties involved. We aimed to use a theory of change approach to formulating a road map on how to successfully integrate diabetes and hypertension care into the existing Friendship Bench in order to come up with an integrated care package for depression, hypertension and diabetes aimed at strengthening NCD care in primary health care systems in Zimbabwe.
METHOD METHODS
A theory of change workshop with 18 stakeholders from diverse backgrounds was carried out in February 2020. Participants included grandmothers working on the Friendship Bench project (n = 4), policymakers from the ministry of health (n = 2), people with lived experience for the three NCDs (n = 4), health care workers (n = 2), and traditional healers (n = 2). Findings from earlier work (situational analysis, desk review, FGDs and clinic-based surveys) on the three NCDs were shared before starting the ToC. A facilitator with previous experience running ToCs led the workshop and facilitated the co-production of the ToC map. Through an iterative process, consensus between the 18 stakeholders was reached, and a causal pathway leading to developing a framework for an intervention was formulated.
RESULTS RESULTS
The ToC singled out the need to use expert clients (people with lived experience) to promote a patient-centred care approach that would leverage the existing Friendship Bench approach. In the face of COVID-19, the stakeholders further endorsed the use of existing digital platforms, notably WhatsApp, as an alternative way to reach out to clients and provide support. Leveraging existing community support groups as an entry point for people in need of NCD care was highlighted as a win-win by all stakeholders. A final framework for an NCD care package supported by Friendship Bench was presented to policymakers and accepted to be piloted in five geographical areas.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The ToC can be used to build consensus on how best to use using an existing intervention for common mental disorders to integrate care for diabetes and hypertension. There is a need to evaluate this new intervention through an adequately powered study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34488732
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06957-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06957-5
pmc: PMC8421086
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

928

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 14;11:564
pubmed: 21756350
Implement Sci. 2016 May 06;11:63
pubmed: 27153985
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 29;4(1):e001084
pubmed: 30775003
Community Ment Health J. 2017 Feb;53(2):143-153
pubmed: 27221123
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 14;9(8):e103754
pubmed: 25121789
Psychiatr Danub. 2009 Dec;21(4):585-8
pubmed: 19935498
Hum Resour Health. 2010 Mar 31;8:8
pubmed: 20356363
Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2383-90
pubmed: 19033418
Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):619-30
pubmed: 11485116
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 23;18(1):46
pubmed: 28330453
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 19;(11):CD009149
pubmed: 24249541
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct;7(10):e1375-e1387
pubmed: 31537368
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21
pubmed: 28202031
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):125
pubmed: 30257683
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):10
pubmed: 30729322
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0180640
pubmed: 28704405
Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):291-8
pubmed: 25385758
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):899
pubmed: 30482195
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Apr 13;15(1):29
pubmed: 28407810
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Nov;28(11):1295-302
pubmed: 25911639
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 26;11:828
pubmed: 22029430
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):43-9
pubmed: 9003169
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218101
pubmed: 31194787
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):55
pubmed: 30871474
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0174631
pubmed: 28358841
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):444-52
pubmed: 23065575
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Feb 29;10:16
pubmed: 26933448
Can Respir J. 2016;2016:9454506
pubmed: 27445572
JAMA. 2016 Dec 27;316(24):2618-2626
pubmed: 28027368
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):885-901
pubmed: 21527446
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):47-52
pubmed: 29946211
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Dec 30;9:40
pubmed: 26719762
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar-Apr;36(2):142-9
pubmed: 24342112
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:91-110
pubmed: 26094079
Nutrients. 2014 Dec 01;6(12):5534-59
pubmed: 25470377

Auteurs

Tiny Tinashe Kamvura (TT)

Research Support Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. tiny.kamvura@friendshipbench.io.

Jean Turner (J)

Research Support Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ephraim Chiriseri (E)

Research Support Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Jermaine Dambi (J)

Rehabilitation Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Ruth Verhey (R)

Research Support Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Dixon Chibanda (D)

Research Support Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH