The Health Impact Fund: making the case for engagement with pharmaceutical laboratories in Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
BRIC
Health Impact Fund
Health inequity
LMIC
Pharmaceutical innovation
Public-private-partnership
R&D
Social impact investing
drug development
Journal
Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 09 2021
06 09 2021
Historique:
received:
16
11
2020
accepted:
29
07
2021
entrez:
7
9
2021
pubmed:
8
9
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite progress in global health, the general disease burden still disproportionately falls on low- and middle-income countries. The health needs of these countries' populations are unmet because there is a shortage in drug research and development, as well as a lack of access to essential drugs. This health disparity is especially problematic for diseases associated with poverty, namely neglected tropical diseases and microbial infections. Currently, the pharmaceutical landscape focuses on innovations determined by profit margins and intellectual property protection. To expand drug accessibility and catalyze research and development for neglected diseases, a team of researchers proposed the Health Impact Fund as a potential solution. However, the fund is predominantly considering partnerships with pharmaceutical giants in high-income countries. This commentary explores the limitations and benefits in partnering with pharmaceutical companies based in Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC), with the goal of expanding the Health Impact Fund's vision to incorporate long-term, local partnerships. Identified limitations to a BRIC country partnership include lower levels of drug development expertise compared to their high-income pharmaceutical counterparts, and whether the Health Impact Fund and the participating stakeholders have the financial capability to assist in bringing a new drug to market. However, potential benefits include the creation of new incentives to fuel competitive local innovation, more equitable routes to drug discovery and development, and a product pipeline that could involve stakeholders in lower- and middle-income countries. Our commentary explores how partnership with pharmaceutical firms in BRIC countries might be advantageous for all: The Health Impact Fund, pharmaceutical companies in BRIC economies, and stakeholders in low- and middle- income countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34488801
doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00744-x
pii: 10.1186/s12992-021-00744-x
pmc: PMC8419667
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pharmaceutical Preparations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet. 2010 Jan 9;375(9709):166-9
pubmed: 20109894
Mcgill J Med. 2006 Jul;9(2):152-9
pubmed: 18523624
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;9:638704
pubmed: 33732678
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Dec;7(12):e1675-e1684
pubmed: 31708148
Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):51-6
pubmed: 21829782
Daru. 2016 May 04;24(1):13
pubmed: 27141958
Popul Health Metr. 2020 Sep 30;18(Suppl 1):14
pubmed: 32993668