Utilisation of quality antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services in Nepal: An analysis of Service Provision Assessment.
Nepal
Technical quality
antenatal care
delivery and postnatal care services
health facility
utilisation
Journal
Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 09 2021
06 09 2021
Historique:
received:
03
06
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
entrez:
7
9
2021
pubmed:
8
9
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nepal has improved access and utilisation of routine maternal and newborn health (MNH) services. Despite improved access to routine MNH services such as antenatal care (ANC), and delivery and postnatal care (PNC) services, the burden of maternal and neonatal deaths in Nepal remains high. Most of those deaths could be prevented by improving utilisation of evidence-informed clinical MNH interventions. However, little is known on determinants of utilisation of such clinical MNH interventions in health facilities (HFs). This study investigated the determinants of utilisation of technical quality MNH services in Nepal. This study used data from the 2015 Nepal Services Provision Assessment. A total of 523 pregnant and 309 postpartum women were included for the analysis of utilisation of technical quality of ANC, and delivery and PNC services, respectively. Outcome variables were utilisation of better quality i) ANC services, and ii) delivery and PNC services while independent variables included features of HFs and health workers, and demographic characteristics of pregnant and postpartum women. Binomial logistic regression was conducted to identify the determinants associated with utilisation of quality MNH services. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were reported at the significance level of p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Women utilised quality ANC services if they attended facilities with better HF capacity (aOR = 2.12;95% CI: 1.03, 4.35). Women utilised better quality delivery and PNC services from private HFs compared to public HFs (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.14, 6.08). Women utilised better technical quality ANC provided by nursing staff compared to physicians (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =2.89; 95% CI: 1.33, 6.29), and from staff supervised by a higher authority compared to those not supervised (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.92). However, compared to province one, women utilised poor quality delivery and PNC services from HFs in province two (aOR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.63). Women utilised quality MNH services at facilities with better HF capacity, service provided by nursing staff, and attended at supervised HFs/health workers. Provincial and municipal governments require strengthening HF capacities (e.g., supply equipment, medicines, supplies), recruiting trained nurse-midwives, and supervising health workers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Nepal has improved access and utilisation of routine maternal and newborn health (MNH) services. Despite improved access to routine MNH services such as antenatal care (ANC), and delivery and postnatal care (PNC) services, the burden of maternal and neonatal deaths in Nepal remains high. Most of those deaths could be prevented by improving utilisation of evidence-informed clinical MNH interventions. However, little is known on determinants of utilisation of such clinical MNH interventions in health facilities (HFs). This study investigated the determinants of utilisation of technical quality MNH services in Nepal.
METHODS
This study used data from the 2015 Nepal Services Provision Assessment. A total of 523 pregnant and 309 postpartum women were included for the analysis of utilisation of technical quality of ANC, and delivery and PNC services, respectively. Outcome variables were utilisation of better quality i) ANC services, and ii) delivery and PNC services while independent variables included features of HFs and health workers, and demographic characteristics of pregnant and postpartum women. Binomial logistic regression was conducted to identify the determinants associated with utilisation of quality MNH services. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were reported at the significance level of p < 0.05 (two-tailed).
RESULTS
Women utilised quality ANC services if they attended facilities with better HF capacity (aOR = 2.12;95% CI: 1.03, 4.35). Women utilised better quality delivery and PNC services from private HFs compared to public HFs (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.14, 6.08). Women utilised better technical quality ANC provided by nursing staff compared to physicians (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =2.89; 95% CI: 1.33, 6.29), and from staff supervised by a higher authority compared to those not supervised (aOR = 1.71; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.92). However, compared to province one, women utilised poor quality delivery and PNC services from HFs in province two (aOR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.63).
CONCLUSIONS
Women utilised quality MNH services at facilities with better HF capacity, service provided by nursing staff, and attended at supervised HFs/health workers. Provincial and municipal governments require strengthening HF capacities (e.g., supply equipment, medicines, supplies), recruiting trained nurse-midwives, and supervising health workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34488808
doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00752-x
pii: 10.1186/s12992-021-00752-x
pmc: PMC8419903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045-9
pubmed: 25929823
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):16
pubmed: 31906938
Public Health Rev. 2020 Dec 21;41(1):31
pubmed: 33349273
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e24-e32
pubmed: 33275948
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):1907026
pubmed: 33821780
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 5;20(1):513
pubmed: 32891116
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Sep 23;3:100028
pubmed: 34327381
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 21;9(11):e113677
pubmed: 25415265
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Feb;24(Suppl 1):31-38
pubmed: 31848924
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Oct 1;18:40
pubmed: 33013204
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Mar 03;14:94
pubmed: 24589139
Int Health. 2021 Jan 14;13(1):30-38
pubmed: 32352145
AIDS Behav. 2018 Jul;22(7):2368-2379
pubmed: 29779162
BMC Nurs. 2020 Jan 8;19:3
pubmed: 31920460
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e131-e141
pubmed: 30370556
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):55-66
pubmed: 30668690
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):738-748
pubmed: 29147054
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):319
pubmed: 28946851
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1185-1192
pubmed: 28591799
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e042840
pubmed: 33986042
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(1):97-109
pubmed: 15847965
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Apr 1;9(1):160-176
pubmed: 33795367
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 18;16(12):e1002990
pubmed: 31851685
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):1-7
pubmed: 24270520
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1192-1204
pubmed: 31571602
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177602
pubmed: 28493987
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 17;19(1):154
pubmed: 31315575
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:1-6
pubmed: 25462599
Int J Reprod Med. 2015;2015:783050
pubmed: 26640814
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 3;21(1):1
pubmed: 33388035
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Dec 22;8(4):195-198
pubmed: 31050964
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Sep 1;32(7):1015-1031
pubmed: 28481996
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140109
pubmed: 26465935
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 11;14(6):e0217853
pubmed: 31185020
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 14;112(Suppl 2):844S-859S
pubmed: 32889522
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jan 16;7(7):645-655
pubmed: 29996584
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018 Apr;7(1):24-28
pubmed: 29582846
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):1163
pubmed: 32711487
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 24;14:45
pubmed: 24456544
Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):431-449
pubmed: 29292533
Health Policy Plan. 2006 Nov;21(6):459-68
pubmed: 17030551
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 03;15:536
pubmed: 26634449
JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
pubmed: 3045356
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Sep 05;11:43
pubmed: 24007354
Glob Health Action. 2014 Aug 11;7:24580
pubmed: 25119066
Global Health. 2018 Feb 6;14(1):17
pubmed: 29409528
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):174
pubmed: 33627115