Impact of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy on Patient-reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Results up to 5 yr in the CHHiP trial (CRUK/06/016).


Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 24 05 2021
revised: 13 07 2021
accepted: 21 07 2021
pubmed: 8 9 2021
medline: 3 2 2022
entrez: 7 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Moderate hypofractionation is the recommended standard of care for localised prostate cancer following the results of trials including Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP). Evaluation of long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is important to confirm safety and enhance patient information. To determine whether 5-yr PROs from the CHHiP quality of life (QoL) substudy confirm 2-yr findings and assess patterns over follow-up. A phase III randomised controlled trial recruited from 2002 to 2011. The QoL substudy completed accrual in 2009; participants were followed up to 5 yr after radiotherapy. Analyses used data snapshot taken on August 26, 2016. A total of 71 radiotherapy centres were included in the study (UK, Republic of Ireland, Switzerland, and New Zealand); all 57 UK centres participated in the QoL substudy. CHHiP recruited 3216 men with localised prostate cancer (cT1b-T3aN0M0). Conventional (74 Gy/37 fractions/7.4 wk) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy/20 fractions/4 wk or 57 Gy/19 fractions/3.8 wk) was delivered with intensity-modulated techniques. University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, Short Form 36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Short Form 12 questionnaires were administered at baseline, before radiotherapy, at 10 wk, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 mo after radiotherapy. The QoL primary endpoint was overall bowel bother. The QoL substudy recruited 2100 patients; 1141 5-yr forms were available from 1957 patients still alive (58%). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-yr prevalence of overall "moderate or big" bowel bother: 19/349 (5.4%), 29/381 (7.6%), and 21/393 (5.3%) for 74, 60, and 57 Gy, respectively; overall urinary or sexual bother at 5 yr was similar between schedules. Bowel and urinary symptoms remained stable from 2 to 5 yr for all schedules. Some evidence of worsening overall sexual bother from baseline to 5 yr was less likely in the hypofractionated schedules compared with 74 Gy (odds ratios for increase in bother score vs 74 Gy: 0.55 [0.30-0.99], p = 0.009 for 60 Gy, and 0.52 [0.29-0.94], p = 0.004 for 57 Gy). General QoL scores were similar between schedules at 5 yr. Longer follow-up confirms earlier findings, with similar patient-reported bowel, urinary, and sexual problems between schedules overall. The continued low incidence of moderate or high bother confirms that moderate hypofractionation should be the standard of care for intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer. We looked at patient-reported outcomes up to 5 yr after treatment in a trial of different radiotherapy schedules for prostate cancer. The findings confirmed that shorter radiotherapy schedules were as safe as standard radiotherapy in terms of bowel, urinary, and sexual problems. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: Bowel, urinary, and sexual symptoms were similar between schedules up to 5 yr. The continued low incidence of moderate/high bother confirms that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered the standard of care for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Moderate hypofractionation is the recommended standard of care for localised prostate cancer following the results of trials including Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP). Evaluation of long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is important to confirm safety and enhance patient information.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether 5-yr PROs from the CHHiP quality of life (QoL) substudy confirm 2-yr findings and assess patterns over follow-up.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A phase III randomised controlled trial recruited from 2002 to 2011. The QoL substudy completed accrual in 2009; participants were followed up to 5 yr after radiotherapy. Analyses used data snapshot taken on August 26, 2016. A total of 71 radiotherapy centres were included in the study (UK, Republic of Ireland, Switzerland, and New Zealand); all 57 UK centres participated in the QoL substudy. CHHiP recruited 3216 men with localised prostate cancer (cT1b-T3aN0M0).
INTERVENTION
Conventional (74 Gy/37 fractions/7.4 wk) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy/20 fractions/4 wk or 57 Gy/19 fractions/3.8 wk) was delivered with intensity-modulated techniques.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, Short Form 36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and Short Form 12 questionnaires were administered at baseline, before radiotherapy, at 10 wk, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 mo after radiotherapy. The QoL primary endpoint was overall bowel bother.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
The QoL substudy recruited 2100 patients; 1141 5-yr forms were available from 1957 patients still alive (58%). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-yr prevalence of overall "moderate or big" bowel bother: 19/349 (5.4%), 29/381 (7.6%), and 21/393 (5.3%) for 74, 60, and 57 Gy, respectively; overall urinary or sexual bother at 5 yr was similar between schedules. Bowel and urinary symptoms remained stable from 2 to 5 yr for all schedules. Some evidence of worsening overall sexual bother from baseline to 5 yr was less likely in the hypofractionated schedules compared with 74 Gy (odds ratios for increase in bother score vs 74 Gy: 0.55 [0.30-0.99], p = 0.009 for 60 Gy, and 0.52 [0.29-0.94], p = 0.004 for 57 Gy). General QoL scores were similar between schedules at 5 yr.
CONCLUSIONS
Longer follow-up confirms earlier findings, with similar patient-reported bowel, urinary, and sexual problems between schedules overall. The continued low incidence of moderate or high bother confirms that moderate hypofractionation should be the standard of care for intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We looked at patient-reported outcomes up to 5 yr after treatment in a trial of different radiotherapy schedules for prostate cancer. The findings confirmed that shorter radiotherapy schedules were as safe as standard radiotherapy in terms of bowel, urinary, and sexual problems. TAKE  HOME MESSAGE: Bowel, urinary, and sexual symptoms were similar between schedules up to 5 yr. The continued low incidence of moderate/high bother confirms that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered the standard of care for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34489210
pii: S2588-9311(21)00145-0
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.07.005
pmc: PMC8674146
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ISRCTN
['ISRCTN97182923']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

980-992

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A25351
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A9895
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C8262/A7253
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : SP2312/021
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-395
pubmed: 31227373
Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):1902-25
pubmed: 22417225
Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):124-9
pubmed: 18647260
Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):920-8
pubmed: 9426724
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):43-54
pubmed: 22169269
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Apr 1;106(5):928-938
pubmed: 31987974
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Jun;103(6):468-78
pubmed: 21830629
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 May 21;29:40-46
pubmed: 34113724
Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):1002-12
pubmed: 9674618
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S59-65; discussion S65
pubmed: 23234635
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 15;97(4):722-731
pubmed: 28244407
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):235-245
pubmed: 33444529
BJU Int. 2007 Feb;99(2):301-10
pubmed: 17155990
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32
pubmed: 27044935
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 1;5(5):664-670
pubmed: 30763425
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437
pubmed: 27626365
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1605-16
pubmed: 26522334
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Mar 15;103(4):823-833
pubmed: 30458234
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1245-50
pubmed: 20350762
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-985
pubmed: 28209443
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
J Urol. 1998 Jun;159(6):1988-92
pubmed: 9598504
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jul;104(1):114-8
pubmed: 22727264
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec 31;21:77-84
pubmed: 32072028
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163
pubmed: 31935027
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890
pubmed: 28296582
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jan;142:62-71
pubmed: 31767473

Auteurs

John N Staffurth (JN)

Cardiff University/Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.

Joanne S Haviland (JS)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: jo.haviland@icr.ac.uk.

Anna Wilkins (A)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Isabel Syndikus (I)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

Vincent Khoo (V)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

David Bloomfield (D)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.

Chris Parker (C)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

John Logue (J)

Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Christopher Scrase (C)

Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.

Alison Birtle (A)

Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK.

Zafar Malik (Z)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

Miguel Panades (M)

Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.

Chinnamani Eswar (C)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

John Graham (J)

Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.

Martin Russell (M)

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.

Catherine Ferguson (C)

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

Joe M O'Sullivan (JM)

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Clare A Cruickshank (CA)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

David Dearnaley (D)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Emma Hall (E)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH