Sensitivity to Communication Partners During Naturalistic AAC Conversations in Cantonese Chinese.
Cantonese Chinese
augmentative and alternative communication
cerebral palsy
communication partner
complex communication needs
linguistic analysis
symbol
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
27
03
2021
accepted:
26
07
2021
entrez:
7
9
2021
pubmed:
8
9
2021
medline:
8
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have shown that graphic-based augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) output tend to be short and simple in structure with non-canonical word order, and that AAC users may show differences when communicating with peers compared to professionals such as speech therapists (STs). However, there was a lack of report for graphic-based AAC in the Chinese context, and the effect of communication partners had not been investigated systematically. In this study with 34 AAC users and 10 STs, we reported common and distinct features of free conversations in Cantonese graphic-based AAC, relative to AAC in other languages. We also found that AAC users were sensitive to different types of communication partners. In particular, when conversing with peers, AAC users produced long messages with equal proportion of questions and responses, which suggested active and bi-directional exchanges. In conversations with STs, AAC users showed high diversity in expressive vocabulary, indicating access to more semantic concepts. Results suggested that the base language and the communication partner are both influential factors that should be considered in studies of graphic-based AAC. The mobile AAC system facilitated free conversations in users with complex communication needs, affording an additional channel for social participation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34489796
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686657
pmc: PMC8416610
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
686657Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Yum, So and Chan.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that this study was partially supported by the Centre for Perceptual and Interactive Intelligence (CPII) Ltd. under the Innovation and Technology Fund. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Références
Augment Altern Commun. 2018 Sep;34(3):180-193
pubmed: 30043650
Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Sep;27(3):183-94
pubmed: 22008031
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e53227
pubmed: 23516390
Augment Altern Commun. 2013 Jun;29(2):107-16
pubmed: 23705813
Augment Altern Commun. 2015 Mar;31(1):77-84
pubmed: 25685883
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246884
pubmed: 33606774
Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(4):271-84
pubmed: 26059542
Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(3):215-33
pubmed: 26147904
Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(2):123-38
pubmed: 18465366
Augment Altern Commun. 2017 Jun;33(2):77-86
pubmed: 28431488
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jul 12;60(7):1980-1998
pubmed: 28672283
Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Mar;23(1):1-15
pubmed: 17364484
Augment Altern Commun. 2017 Sep;33(3):131-138
pubmed: 28597688
Mol Autism. 2017 Oct 3;8:52
pubmed: 29026509