A Developmental Embodied Choice Perspective Explains the Development of Numerical Choices.
bounded rationality
cue
development
embodied choice
fingers
magnitude-judgment task
numerical representations
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
13
04
2021
accepted:
09
07
2021
entrez:
7
9
2021
pubmed:
8
9
2021
medline:
8
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of this paper is to explore how an embodied view can redirect our understanding of decision making. To achieve this goal, we contribute a developmental embodied choice perspective. Our perspective integrates embodiment and bounded rationality from a developmental view in which the body provides cues that are used in abstract choices. Hereby, the cues evolve with the body that is not static and changes through development. To demonstrate the body's involvement in abstract choices, we will consider choices in numerical settings in which the body is not necessarily needed for the solution. For this, we consider the magnitude-judgment task in which one has to choose the larger of two magnitudes. In a nutshell, our perspective will pinpoint how the concept of embodied choices can explain the development of numerical choices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34489801
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694750
pmc: PMC8417601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
694750Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Michirev, Musculus and Raab.
Références
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Apr;19(4):563-76
pubmed: 17381248
Cortex. 2008 Apr;44(4):386-92
pubmed: 18387569
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Aug;109(4):525-39
pubmed: 21497826
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):107-43
pubmed: 25164802
Trends Neurosci. 1998 Aug;21(8):355-61
pubmed: 9720604
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S271-4
pubmed: 22806653
Cognition. 2015 Nov;144:14-28
pubmed: 26210644
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15651-6
pubmed: 17028177
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45
pubmed: 17705682
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:633100
pubmed: 33995187
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:141-164
pubmed: 30256718
Cerebellum. 2012 Jun;11(2):505-25
pubmed: 22068584
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):455-79
pubmed: 21038261
Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 09;2:197
pubmed: 21927606
Cortex. 2008 Apr;44(4):368-75
pubmed: 18387567
Dev Sci. 2018 Jul;21(4):e12623
pubmed: 29071796
Cognition. 2010 Aug;116(2):251-66
pubmed: 20513381
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 29;2:328
pubmed: 22144969
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18116-20
pubmed: 24145427
Psychol Sci. 2016 Dec;27(12):1600-1610
pubmed: 27765900
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Aug;16:34-37
pubmed: 28813351
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(1):27-39
pubmed: 17909768
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 07;10:1825
pubmed: 31440188
Child Neuropsychol. 2005 Oct;11(5):413-30
pubmed: 16306017
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
pubmed: 12613670
Dyslexia. 2009 Feb;15(1):61-8
pubmed: 19089884
Cortex. 2008 Apr;44(4):359-67
pubmed: 18387566
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 17;2:260
pubmed: 22028696
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:1012
pubmed: 32528379
Exp Brain Res. 1993;95(1):151-65
pubmed: 8405248
Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(2):B63-70
pubmed: 9818514