Biomechanics of a calcar loading and a shortened tapered femoral stem: Comparative in-vitro testing of primary stability and strain distribution.

Cadaver Mechanical stress Metaphyseal Micromotions Primary stability Short stem Stress-shielding Total hip arthroplasty

Journal

Journal of experimental orthopaedics
ISSN: 2197-1153
Titre abrégé: J Exp Orthop
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101653750

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 19 06 2021
accepted: 13 08 2021
entrez: 7 9 2021
pubmed: 8 9 2021
medline: 8 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The most common femoral short stems available on the market can, in principle, be divided with regard to their anchoring concepts into a calcar loading and a shortened tapered design. The purpose of this study was to compare the primary stability and stress-shielding of two short stems, which correspond to these two different anchoring concepts. Using seven paired fresh frozen human cadaver femurs, primary axial and rotational stabilities under dynamic load (100-1600 N) were evaluated by miniature displacement transducers after 100,000 load cycles. Changes in cortical strains were measured before and after implantation of both stem types to detect implant-specific load transmission and possible stress-shielding effects. Reversible and irreversible micromotions under dynamic load displayed no significant differences between the two implants. Implantation of either stem types resulted in a reduction of cortical strains in the proximal femur, which was less pronounced for the calcar loading implant. Both short stems displayed comparable micromotions far below the critical threshold above which osseointegration may disturbed. Neither short stem could avoid proximal stress-shielding. This effect was less pronounced for the calcar loading short stem, which corresponds to a more physiological load transmission.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34491456
doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00388-1
pii: 10.1186/s40634-021-00388-1
pmc: PMC8423873
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

74

Subventions

Organisme : aesculap implant systems
ID : P711

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Oct;103(4):372-379
pubmed: 29858615
J Orthop Res. 2013 Aug;31(8):1180-6
pubmed: 23553802
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007 Jan;221(1):39-46
pubmed: 17315767
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014 Mar 18;6(1):5211
pubmed: 24744840
J Orthop Res. 2012 Nov;30(11):1822-9
pubmed: 22513505
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):483-8
pubmed: 24146175
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Jan;60(1):75-85
pubmed: 624762
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):343
pubmed: 28784121
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1997;25(4-5):409-83
pubmed: 9505138
J Orthop Res. 2003 Jul;21(4):691-6
pubmed: 12798070
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jan - Mar;22(1):96-103
pubmed: 30126775
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Oct;58:14-20
pubmed: 30005422
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):1742-52
pubmed: 25320202
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016 Feb;32:28-33
pubmed: 26785385
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000 Dec;15(10):750-5
pubmed: 11050357
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):601-609
pubmed: 27597431
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Jan;69(1):45-55
pubmed: 3818732
Med Eng Phys. 1997 Mar;19(2):187-99
pubmed: 9203154
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Jun;24(5):429-34
pubmed: 19307048
Orthopedics. 2015 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S40-5
pubmed: 25826631
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jul;(208):108-13
pubmed: 3720113
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 01;16:371
pubmed: 26627999
J Biomech. 1993 Aug;26(8):969-90
pubmed: 8349721
Med Eng Phys. 2015 Aug;37(8):820-5
pubmed: 26117334
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2017;19(1):141-149
pubmed: 28552922
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jun;21(5):495-501
pubmed: 16457913
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):369-77
pubmed: 23271689
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34
pubmed: 19797590
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Aug;132(8):1125-31
pubmed: 22546932
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995 Oct;24(10):766-70
pubmed: 8593558
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 29;20(1):261
pubmed: 31142303
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 May;79(5):707-14
pubmed: 9160943
Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2045-50
pubmed: 25027975
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Feb;27(2):158-64
pubmed: 21889243
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):125-30
pubmed: 26613788
Orthopedics. 2015 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S51-6
pubmed: 25826634

Auteurs

Tobias Freitag (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany. tobias.freitag@rku.de.

Ralf Bieger (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Hartmuth Kiefer (H)

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Lukas Hospital, Buende, Germany.

Daniel Dornacher (D)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Heiko Reichel (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Centre, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Anita Ignatius (A)

Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Trauma Research Centre, Ulm University Medical Centre, Helmholtzstr. 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Lutz Dürselen (L)

Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Trauma Research Centre, Ulm University Medical Centre, Helmholtzstr. 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Classifications MeSH