Adverse Events in the Digital Age: Finding the Sharpest Tool in the Box.

Automation Digital data Pharmacovigilance Technology Typology

Journal

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
ISSN: 2168-4804
Titre abrégé: Ther Innov Regul Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101597411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 05 05 2021
accepted: 25 08 2021
pubmed: 8 9 2021
medline: 8 9 2021
entrez: 7 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Digital health arrived to society and it generates data which is growing exponentially. Pharma and medical device industry recently embarked on this journey. Digital tools became everyday experience both in development as well as post-market settings. These non-traditional data sources may contain relevant safety, efficacy, effectiveness and other knowledge, which are valuable for understanding and further characterizing safety profile of a given medicinal and medical device product. It is however unclear what new responsibilities are associated with the use of such tools and data generated / collected by them. Current regulatory framework does not provide very clear guidance on it. Teams are struggling to interpret expectations originated from regulations, ethics and patients. We present practical approaches for data management and we suggest that a detailed assessment of projects is conducted to identify obligations for screening digitally-sourced data. Compliance with regulations is obligatory, but it is also incumbent on the sponsor to define a data management strategy covering the purpose of the activities, and the value of the data gathered. Decisions thereafter should be aligned with the mission, vision, and objectives defined by the sponsor.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34491555
doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00337-1
pii: 10.1007/s43441-021-00337-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23-37

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Drug Information Association, Inc.

Références

Good pharmacovigilance practices | European Medicines Agency (europa.eu)
Lewis DJ, McCallum JF. Utilizing advanced technologies to augment pharmacovigilance systems: challenges and opportunities. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54(4):888–99.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00023-3
Download MDR - Medical Device Regulation (medical-device-regulation.eu); Guidance on Clinical Evaluation (MDR) / Performance Evaluation (IVDR) of Medical Device Software; DocsRoom - European Commission (europa.eu)
Guidance for Industry Good Pharmacovigilance Practices and Pharmacoepidemiologic Assessment (fda.gov)
CFR 314.80—reporting of adverse drug experiences http://federal.elaws.us/cfr/title21.part314.section314.80
ICH E2D Post-approval safety data management: Definitions and standards for expedited reporting. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E2D_Guideline.pdf
Stehlik J, Schmalfuss C, Bozkurt B, Nativi-Nicolau J, Wohlfahrt P, Wegerich S, et al. Continuous wearable monitoring analytics predict heart failure hospitalization, the LINK-HF multicenter study. Circulation. 2020;13(3):513.
Husentruy K, Kjoersvik O, Dobracki P, Savage E, Mishalov E, Cherry M, et al. Validating intelligent automation systems in pharmacovigilance: insights from good manufacturing practices. Drug Saf. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-01030-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01030-2
Naranjo CA. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239–45.
doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154
Venulet J, Ciucci AG, Berneker GC. Updating of a method for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1986;24:559–68.
pubmed: 3781677
The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOcausality_assessment.pdf
Stagi L, Bocchi I, Bianco S, Sirizzotti G, Bernardini D, Calderazzo V, et al. Pharmacovigilance and the digital world in Italy: presentation of the results of a national survey. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021;12:1–8.
doi: 10.1177/2042098620985991

Auteurs

Robert Di Giovanni (R)

Chief Medical Office and Patient Safety, Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. robert.di_giovanni@novartis.com.

Andrew Cochrane (A)

Chief Medical Office and Patient Safety, Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

David J Lewis (DJ)

Chief Medical Office and Patient Safety, Global Drug Development, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Oeflinger Strasse 44, 79664, Wehr, Germany.
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, Herts, UK.

Classifications MeSH