Predictors and clinical impact of infarct progression rate in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial.


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 10 07 2021
accepted: 27 08 2021
pubmed: 9 9 2021
medline: 17 8 2022
entrez: 8 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Determining infarct progression rate in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for patient triage, treatment decision-making, and outcome prognostication. To estimate infarct progression rate in patients with AIS with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and determine its predictors and impact on clinical outcome. Data are from the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial. Patients with AIS with time from last known well to randomization <6 hours and near-complete reperfusion following endovascular treatment were included. Infarct growth rate (mL/h) was estimated by dividing 24 hour infarct volume (measured by non-contrast CT or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging) by time from last known well to reperfusion. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association of patient baseline variables with log-transformed infarct progression rate. The association of infarct progression rate and good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) was determined using multivariable logistic regression. Four hundred and nine patients were included in the study. Median infarct progression rate was 4.74 mL/h (IQR 1.25-14.84). Collateral status (β: -0.81 (95% CI -1.20 to -0.41)), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS, β: -0.34 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.23)), blood glucose(β: 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.16)), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHS score (β: 0.07 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.10)) were associated with log-transformed infarct progression rate. Clinical and imaging baseline variables explained 23% of the variance in infarct progression rate. Infarct progression rate was significantly associated with good outcome (aOR per 1 mL/h increase: 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98)). In this sample of patients presenting within the early time window with LVO and near-complete recanalization, infarct progression rate was significantly associated with good outcome. A significant association between ASPECTS, collateral status, blood glucose, and NIHSS score was observed, but baseline imaging and clinical characteristics explained only a small proportion of the interindividual variance. More research on measurable factors affecting infarct growth is needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Determining infarct progression rate in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is important for patient triage, treatment decision-making, and outcome prognostication.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To estimate infarct progression rate in patients with AIS with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and determine its predictors and impact on clinical outcome.
METHODS METHODS
Data are from the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial. Patients with AIS with time from last known well to randomization <6 hours and near-complete reperfusion following endovascular treatment were included. Infarct growth rate (mL/h) was estimated by dividing 24 hour infarct volume (measured by non-contrast CT or diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging) by time from last known well to reperfusion. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association of patient baseline variables with log-transformed infarct progression rate. The association of infarct progression rate and good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) was determined using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four hundred and nine patients were included in the study. Median infarct progression rate was 4.74 mL/h (IQR 1.25-14.84). Collateral status (β: -0.81 (95% CI -1.20 to -0.41)), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS, β: -0.34 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.23)), blood glucose(β: 0.09 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.16)), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHS score (β: 0.07 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.10)) were associated with log-transformed infarct progression rate. Clinical and imaging baseline variables explained 23% of the variance in infarct progression rate. Infarct progression rate was significantly associated with good outcome (aOR per 1 mL/h increase: 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98)).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In this sample of patients presenting within the early time window with LVO and near-complete recanalization, infarct progression rate was significantly associated with good outcome. A significant association between ASPECTS, collateral status, blood glucose, and NIHSS score was observed, but baseline imaging and clinical characteristics explained only a small proportion of the interindividual variance. More research on measurable factors affecting infarct growth is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34493575
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017994
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017994
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

886-891

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AMD: stock options and patients (Circle Neurovascular); honoraria for CME events (Boehringer Ingelheim); consultant (Medtronic). AYP: research grant to the institution (Stryker); payment/honoraria for lectures: C-CHANGE education program (update on stroke guidelines for general practitioners); participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board (FLOW trial); chair, Canadian Stroke Consortium National Stroke Fellowship Program. RGN: grant to Emory University (Cerenovus); consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, Cerenovus, Genentech, Hybernia, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Philips, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Stryker Neurovascular, Shanghai Wallaby, and Synchron; consulting fees for medical legal consultations; stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Viz-AI, RapidPulse, and Perfuze; investor in Viz-AI, Perfuze, Cerebrotech, Reist LLC, Truvic, and Viseon. MVJ: treasurer, Society of Neurointerventional Surgery 2019–2021; vice president, Society of Neurointerventional Surgery 2021–present. MDH: grants to the University of Calgary for ESCAPE-NA1 (NoNO Inc); grants to the University of Calgary for ESCAPE-NA1 (CIHR); grants to the University of Calgary for ESCAPE-NA1 and the QuICR Alberta Stroke Program (Alberta Innovates); grants to the University of Calgary for TEMPO 2 (Boehringer Ingelheim); grants to the University of Calgary (Biogen); paid work for adjudication of clinical trial outcomes (Sun Pharma), US patent 62/086,077 and 10,916,346 (licensed to Circle Neurovascular); DSMC Chair (RACECAT, Oncovir Hiltonel, DUMAS Trials); DSMB member (ARTESIA, BRAIN-AF trials); president Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (not for profit); board member founder and part ownership (Circle Neurovascular). MT: NoNO Inc. shareholder; president and CEO of NoNO Inc., owns patent for Nerinetide/NA1. MG: honoraria from Medtronic, Microvention, Mentice, and Stryker (teaching and advice on acute stroke intervention); ESCAPE-NA1 was funded through a grant to the University of Calgary from NoNO Inc.

Auteurs

Johanna Maria Ospel (JM)

Department of Radiology, Universitatsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Rosalie McDonough (R)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Andrew M Demchuk (AM)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Bijoy K Menon (BK)

Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Mohammed A Almekhlafi (MA)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Raul G Nogueira (RG)

Departments of Radiology, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Ryan A McTaggart (RA)

Faculty of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Alexandre Y Poppe (AY)

Department of Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Brian H Buck (BH)

Department of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Daniel Roy (D)

Faculty of Medicine, University de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Diogo C Haussen (DC)

Department of Neurology and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

René Chapot (R)

Department of Intracranial Endovascular Therapy, Alfried-Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany.

Thalia S Field (TS)

Department of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Mahesh V Jayaraman (MV)

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Michael Tymianski (M)

NoNO Inc, NoNO Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Michael D Hill (MD)

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Mayank Goyal (M)

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada mgoyal2412@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH