CLinical Assessment of WEB device in Ruptured aneurYSms (CLARYS): results of 1-month and 1-year assessment of rebleeding protection and clinical safety in a multicenter study.
aneurysm
device
hemorrhage
intervention
subarachnoid
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
09
03
2021
accepted:
15
08
2021
pubmed:
9
9
2021
medline:
19
7
2022
entrez:
8
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary goal of the CLARYS study is to assess the protection against rebleeding when treating ruptured bifurcation aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device. The CLARYS study is a prospective, multicenter study conducted in 13 European centers. Patients with ruptured bifurcation aneurysms were consecutively included between February 2016 and September 2017. The primary endpoint was defined as the rebleeding rate of the target aneurysm treated with the WEB within 30 days postprocedure. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural and postprocedural adverse events, total procedure and fluoroscopy times, and modified Rankin Scale score at 1 month and 1 year. Sixty patients with 60 ruptured bifurcation aneurysms to be treated with the WEB were included. A WEB device was successfully implanted in 93.3%. The rebleeding rate at 1 month and 1 year was 0%. The mean fluoroscopy time was 27.0 min. Twenty-three periprocedural complications were observed in 18 patients and resolved without sequelae in 16 patients. Two of these complications were attributed to the procedure and/or the use of the WEB, leading to a procedure/device-related intraoperative complication rate of 3.3%. Overall mortality at 1 month and 1 year was 1.7% and 3.8%, respectively and overall morbidity at 1 month and 1 year was 15% and 9.6%, respectively. WEB-related 1-month and 1-year morbidity and mortality was 0%. The interim results of CLARYS show that the endovascular treatment of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms with the WEB is safe and effective and, in particular, provides effective protection against rebleeding. It may induce profound change in the endovascular management of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The primary goal of the CLARYS study is to assess the protection against rebleeding when treating ruptured bifurcation aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device.
METHODS
METHODS
The CLARYS study is a prospective, multicenter study conducted in 13 European centers. Patients with ruptured bifurcation aneurysms were consecutively included between February 2016 and September 2017. The primary endpoint was defined as the rebleeding rate of the target aneurysm treated with the WEB within 30 days postprocedure. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural and postprocedural adverse events, total procedure and fluoroscopy times, and modified Rankin Scale score at 1 month and 1 year.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty patients with 60 ruptured bifurcation aneurysms to be treated with the WEB were included. A WEB device was successfully implanted in 93.3%. The rebleeding rate at 1 month and 1 year was 0%. The mean fluoroscopy time was 27.0 min. Twenty-three periprocedural complications were observed in 18 patients and resolved without sequelae in 16 patients. Two of these complications were attributed to the procedure and/or the use of the WEB, leading to a procedure/device-related intraoperative complication rate of 3.3%. Overall mortality at 1 month and 1 year was 1.7% and 3.8%, respectively and overall morbidity at 1 month and 1 year was 15% and 9.6%, respectively. WEB-related 1-month and 1-year morbidity and mortality was 0%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The interim results of CLARYS show that the endovascular treatment of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms with the WEB is safe and effective and, in particular, provides effective protection against rebleeding. It may induce profound change in the endovascular management of ruptured bifurcation aneurysms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34493578
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017416
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017416
pmc: PMC9304095
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
807-814Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JF acts as associate editor of the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery; MM acts as a member of the editorial board of Neuroradiology. LS: consultant for Microvention, Balt, Phenox, Stryker, Medtronic, PI for CLARYS, grant or contract from Philips with institution; DH: consultant for Microvention; XB: consultant for Microvention; JF: Consultant for Medtronic, Microvention, and Cerus; VCo: consultant for Microvention, educational grant and research grant with payment to institution; TL: consultant for Microvention/Sequent Medical, Stryker, Medtronic, and Cerus; MM: consultant and expert testimony for Medtronic, Microvention, and Stryker with payment to institution; WW: payment or honoraria for proctoring and lectures from Microvention; CC: consultant for Microvention, MIVI, Stryker, and Cerenovus; J-HB: payment or honoraria for proctoring and lectures from Microvention; MB: consultant for Microvention, Cerenovus, Acandis, and Rapid; GB: support for travel from Microvention; SF: honoraria for lecture and data preparations regarding WEB; AB: consultant for Microvention; JM: consultant for Microvention. LP: consultant for Microvention, Balt, Perflow, Phenox, Vesalio, clinical event adjudicator for CLARYS; JBy: core laboratory reviewer for CLARYS.
Références
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 May;13(5):443-446
pubmed: 32719167
Neurosurgery. 2011 Oct;69(4):837-41; discussion 842
pubmed: 21623247
Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):916-23
pubmed: 20720074
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Dec;38(12):2282-2287
pubmed: 28882858
Stroke. 1994 Nov;25(11):2315-28
pubmed: 7974568
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1682-8
pubmed: 26138136
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr;11(4):386-389
pubmed: 30291206
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1197-1201
pubmed: 28798268
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):381-389
pubmed: 32096707
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jun;10(6):553-559
pubmed: 28965106
Neurosurgery. 2004 Oct;55(4):779-86; discussion 786-9
pubmed: 15458586
Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):846-55
pubmed: 19318586
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1721-7
pubmed: 26138139
Interv Neuroradiol. 2002 Jun 30;8(2):107-19
pubmed: 20594519
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):29-37
pubmed: 23238862
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jul 1;87(1):E16-E22
pubmed: 32357228
Neuroradiology. 2014 Sep;56(9):755-61
pubmed: 24930127
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Sep;11(9):924-930
pubmed: 30992395
J Neuroradiol. 1997 Jun;24(1):30-44
pubmed: 9303942
Lancet. 2005 Sep 3-9;366(9488):809-17
pubmed: 16139655
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1191-1196
pubmed: 28096478
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1250-6
pubmed: 26381253
Lancet. 2015 Feb 21;385(9969):691-7
pubmed: 25465111
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1151-1155
pubmed: 28450432
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;37(4):655-9
pubmed: 26514608