Lung ultrasound as a predictor of mortality of patients with COVID-19.
Journal
Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
ISSN: 1806-3756
Titre abrégé: J Bras Pneumol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101222274
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
10
03
2021
accepted:
04
06
2021
entrez:
8
9
2021
pubmed:
9
9
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate the performance of lung ultrasound to determine short-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit. This is a Prospective, observational study. Between July and November 2020, 59 patients were included and underwent at least two LUS assessments using LUS score (range 0-42) on day of admission, day 5th, and 10th of admission. Age was 66.5±15 years, APACHE II was 8.3±3.9, 12 (20%) patients had malignancy, 46 (78%) patients had a non-invasive ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula and 38 (64%) patients required mechanical ventilation. The median stay in ICU was 12 days (IQR 8.5-20.5 days). ICU or hospital mortality was 54%. On admission, the LUS score was 20.8±6.1; on day 5th and day 10th of admission, scores were 27.6±5.5 and 29.4±5.3, respectively (P=0.007). As clinical condition deteriorated the LUS score increased, with a positive correlation of 0.52, P <0.001. Patients with worse LUS on day 5th versus better score had a mortality of 76% versus 33% (OR 6.29, 95%CI 2.01-19.65, p. 0.003); a similar difference was observed on day 10. LUS score of 5th day of admission had an area under the curve of 0.80, best cut-point of 27, sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.78 respectively. These findings position LUS as a simple and reproducible method to predict the course of COVID-19 patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34495211
pii: S1806-37132021000400205
doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210092
pmc: PMC8647154
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
por
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20210092Références
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jul;39(7):1413-1419
pubmed: 32227492
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):2128-2129
pubmed: 32975585
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021 Jan 29;538:125-131
pubmed: 33218685
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;29(1):60-68
pubmed: 33511802
Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):151-157
pubmed: 31939782
Biomed Eng Online. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):27
pubmed: 33743707
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513
pubmed: 32007143
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1873-1883
pubmed: 32860069
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;46(9):1707-1713
pubmed: 32728966
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91
pubmed: 22392031
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2021 Jan 25;9(1):1
pubmed: 33491147
Respiration. 2014;88(6):458-68
pubmed: 25376260
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep;37(9):1488-93
pubmed: 21809107
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Feb;14(1):70-4
pubmed: 18195629
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;10(6):693-8
pubmed: 19675509
Respiration. 2020;99(7):617-624
pubmed: 32570265
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Apr;47(4):444-454
pubmed: 33743018
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Nov;46(11):2918-2926
pubmed: 32771222
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 27;18(7):
pubmed: 33801638
Crit Care. 2012 Feb 17;16(1):R30
pubmed: 22340202
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):e27
pubmed: 32203708
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1648-1655
pubmed: 32200663
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 May;15(5):700-704
pubmed: 32114094
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jan;100(1):9-15
pubmed: 14695718