Measurement invariance of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in coronary artery disease.
Confirmatory factor analysis
Coronary artery disease
Measurement invariance
Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Journal
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-2649
Titre abrégé: Qual Life Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9210257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
accepted:
26
08
2021
pubmed:
9
9
2021
medline:
31
3
2022
entrez:
8
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely used patient-reported measure of health status in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparisons of SAQ scores amongst population groups and over time rely on the assumption that its factorial structure is invariant. This study evaluates the measurement invariance of the SAQ across different demographic and clinical groups and over time. Data were obtained from the Alberta Provincial Project on Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry, a registry of patients who received coronary angiogram in Alberta, Canada. The study cohort consists of adult patients who completed the paper-based version of the 16-item Canadian version of the SAQ (SAQ-CAN) 2 weeks and 1-year post-coronary angiogram between 2009 and 2016. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess configural, weak, strong, and strict measurement invariance across age groups, sex, angina type, treatment, and over time. Model fit was assessed using the comparative fit index and root mean square error of approximation. Of the 8101 patients included in these analysis, 1300 (16.1%) were at least 75 years old, while 1755 (21.7%) were female, 5154 (63.6%) were diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, 1177 (14.5%) received coronary artery bypass graft treatment, and 3279 had complete data on the SAQ-CAN at both occasions. There was evidence of strict invariance across age, sex, and angina type, and treatment groups, but partial strict invariance was established over time. SAQ-CAN can be used to compare the health status of coronary artery disease patients across population groups and over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34495443
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02987-y
pii: 10.1007/s11136-021-02987-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1223-1236Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 400774
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 400774
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Références
Khan, M. A. B., Hashim, M. J., Mustafa, H., Baniyas, M. Y., Al Suwaidi, S. K. B. M., Alkatheeri, R., Khalfan, F. M., et al. (2020). Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: Results from the global burden of disease study. Cureus, 12(7), e9439.
GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. (2016). Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet, 388(10053), 1459–1544.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1
Statistics Canada. Table 102–0561—The ten leading causes of death, 2012. CANSIM (death database) [Internet]. Statistics Canada; 2015 Dec 10 [cited 2016 Sep 14]. www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-625-x/2015001/article/14296-eng.htm
Rumsfeld, J. S., Alexander, K. P., Goff, D. C., Graham, M. M., Ho, P. M., Masoudi, F. A., Moser, D. K., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular health: The importance of measuring patient-reported health status: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 127, 2233–2249.
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182949a2e
Greenfield, S., & Nelson, E. C. (1992). Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Medical Care, MS23-MS41.
Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., Jensen, S. E., Butt, Z., Nowinski, C. J., Rothrock, N., et al. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. Berlin: RTI Press.
doi: 10.3768/rtipress.2015.bk.0014.1509
Cappelleri, J. C., & Bushmakin, A. G. (2014). Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 23(5), 460–483.
doi: 10.1177/0962280213476377
Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., Lek, K., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2015). Measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1064.
Anker, S. D., Agewall, S., Borggrefe, M., Calvert, M., Jaime Caro, J., Cowie, M. R., et al. (2014). The importance of patient-reported outcomes: A call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials. European Heart Journal, 35(30), 2001–2009.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu205
Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S78.
Yu, S., & Liu, H. (2012). Development and validation of the simplified Chinese version of Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SC-SAQ). Heart, 98(Suppl 2), E180-E181.
Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonnell, M., et al. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 333–341.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9
Dougherty, C. M., Dewhurst, T., Nichol, W. P., & Spertus, J. (1998). Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle angina questionnaire, short form health survey (SF-36), and quality of life index-cardiac version III. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(7), 569–575.
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00028-6
Seki, S., Kato, N., Ito, N., Kinugawa, K., Ono, M., Motomura, N., et al. (2010). Validity and reliability of Seattle angina questionnaire Japanese version in patients with coronary artery disease. Asian Nursing Research, 4(2), 57–63.
doi: 10.1016/S1976-1317(10)60006-0
Pettersen, K. I., Reikvam, A., & Stavem, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Norwegian translation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire following myocardial infarction. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 883–889.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0802-2
Kimble, L. P., Dunbar, S. B., Weintraub, W. S., McGuire, D. B., Fazio, S., De, A. K., et al. (2002). The Seattle angina questionnaire: Reliability and validity in women with chronic stable angina. Heart disease (Hagerstown, Md.), 4(4), 206.
Taheri-Kharameh, Z., Heravi-Karimooi, M., Rejeh, N., Hajizadeh, E., Vaismoradi, M., Snelgrove, S., et al. (2017). Translation and psychometric testing of the Farsi version of the Seattle angina questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0808-4
Garratt, A. M., Hutchinson, A., & Russell, I. (2001). The UK version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-UK): Reliability, validity and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(9), 907–915.
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00352-3
Lawal, O. A., Awosoga, O., Santana, M. J., James, M. T., Southern, D. A., Wilton, S. B., et al. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of a Canadian version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-CAN). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01627-2
Ghali, W., & Knudtson, M. (2000). on behalf of the APPROACH investigators: Overview of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 16(10), 1225–1230.
Dzavik, V., Ghali, W. A., Norris, C., Mitchell, L. B., Koshal, A., Saunders, L. D., et al. (2001). Long-term survival in 11,661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: A report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. American Heart Journal, 142(1), 119–126.
doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.116072
Graham, M. M., Norris, C. M., Galbraith, P. D., Knudtson, M. L., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Quality of life after revascularization in the elderly. European Heart Journal, 27(14), 1690–1698.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl038
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Browne, M. W. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Nadelmann, J., Frishman, W. H., Ooi, W. L., Tepper, D., Greenberg, S., Guzik, H., Lazar, E. J., et al. (1990). Prevalence, incidence and prognosis of recognised and unrecognised myocardial infarction in persons aged 75 years or older—The Bronx aging study. American Journal of Cardiology, 66, 533–537.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90477-I
Lye, M., & Donnellan, C. (2000). Heart disease in the elderly. Heart, 84, 560–566.
doi: 10.1136/heart.84.5.560
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B.E. (1998). Multi-group latent variable models for varying numbers of items and factors with cross-national and longitudinal applications. Marketing Letters, 9(1), 21–35.
doi: 10.1023/A:1007911903032
Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ
doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729380
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Team, R. C. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user's guide. Muthén & Muthén.
Norris, C. M., Spertus, J. A., Jensen, L., Johnson, J., Hegadoren, K. M., & Ghali, W. A. (2008). Sex and gender discrepancies in health-related quality of life outcomes among patients with established coronary artery disease. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 1(2), 123–130.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.793448
Norris, C. M., Murray, J. W., Triplett, L. S., & Hegadoren, K. M. (2010). Gender roles in persistent sex differences in health-related quality-of-life outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Gender Medicine, 7(4), 330–339.
doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.07.005
Norris, C. M., Ghali, W. A., Galbraith, P. D., Graham, M. M., Jensen, L. A., & Knudtson, M. L. (2004). Women with coronary artery disease report worse health-related quality of life outcomes compared to men. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 1–11.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-21
Gijsberts, C. M., Agostoni, P., Hoefer, I. E., Asselbergs, F. W., Pasterkamp, G., Nathoe, H., et al. (2015). Gender differences in health-related quality of life in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Open Heart, 2(1), e000231.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000231
Norris, C. M., Saunders, L. D., Ghali, W. A., Brant, R., Galbraith, P. D., Graham, M., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease treated with cardiac surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention or medical management. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 20(12), 1259–1266.
pubmed: 15494780
Cohen, D. J., Van Hout, B., Serruys, P. W., Mohr, F. W., Macaya, C., Den Heijer, P., et al. (2011). Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(11), 1016–1026.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001508
Veenstra, M., Pettersen, K. I., Rollag, A., & Stavem, K. (2004). Association of changes in health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease with coronary procedures and sociodemographic characteristics. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 1–8.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-56
Sajobi, T. T., Wang, M., Awosoga, O., Santana, M., Southern, D., Liang, Z., et al. (2018). Trajectories of health-related quality of life in coronary artery disease. Circulation, 11(3), e003661.
pubmed: 29545392
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.
doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00045-3
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (2000). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research.
Schwartz, C. E. (2010). Applications of response shift theory and methods to participation measurement: A brief history of a young field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9), S38–S43.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.029
Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 587–598.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-0830-y
Oort, F., Visser, M., & Sprangers, M. (2009). Measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift: Formal definitions of measurement bias, explanation bias, and response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(1), 126–121.
Wu, X., Sawatzky, R., Hopman, W., Mayo, N., Sajobi, T. T., Liu, J., et al. (2017). Latent variable mixture models to test for differential item functioning: A population-based analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0674-0
Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., Kopec, J. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Latent variable mixture models: A promising approach for the validation of patient reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 637–650.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9976-6
Sajobi, T. T., Josephson, C. B., Sawatzky, R., Wang, M., Lawal, O., Patten, S. B., et al. (2021). Quality of life in epilepsy: Same questions, different meaning. Epilepsia, 62(9), 2094–2102.
doi: 10.1111/epi.17012