Different Approaches for Manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Sheet-Based Structures by Electron Beam Melting.
Electron Beam Melting
Finite Element Analysis
computed tomography
lightweight structures
scaffold
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Aug 2021
29 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
revised:
19
08
2021
accepted:
20
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
11
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Targeting biomedical applications, Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) gyroid sheet-based structures were successfully manufactured for the first time by Electron Beam Melting in two different production Themes, i.e., inputting a zero (Wafer Theme) and a 200 µm (Melt Theme) wall thickness. Initial assumption was that in both cases, EBM manufacturing should yield the structures with similar mechanical properties as in a Wafer-mode, as wall thickness is determined by the minimal beam spot size of ca 200 µm. Their surface morphology, geometry, and mechanical properties were investigated by means of electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT), and uniaxial tests (both compression and tension). Application of different manufacturing Themes resulted in specimens with different wall thicknesses while quasi-elastic gradients for different Themes was found to be of 1.5 GPa, similar to the elastic modulus of human cortical bone tissue. The specific energy absorption at 50% strain was also similar for the two types of structures. Finite element simulations were also conducted to qualitatively analyze the deformation process and the stress distribution under mechanical load. Simulations demonstrated that in the elastic regime wall, regions oriented parallel to the load are primarily affected by deformation. We could conclude that gyroids manufactured in Wafer and Melt Themes are equally effective in mimicking mechanical properties of the bones.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34501001
pii: ma14174912
doi: 10.3390/ma14174912
pmc: PMC8434612
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (State Project "Science")
ID : №WSWW-2020-0011
Organisme : EU Regional Development Fund and Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Grant
ID : 20202610
Organisme : G-RISC program, German Federal Foreign Office via the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
ID : Funding Decision No. M-2020a-6
Organisme : the Tomsk Polytechnic University Competitiveness Enhancement Program grant
Références
Int J Biomater. 2011;2011:836587
pubmed: 21765831
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 03;11(3):
pubmed: 29510492
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Jan 1;94:901-908
pubmed: 30423778
Acta Biomater. 2017 Apr 15;53:572-584
pubmed: 28213101
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2011 Jul;18(Pt 4):617-29
pubmed: 21685680
Materials (Basel). 2015 Apr 21;8(4):1871-1896
pubmed: 28788037
Biomaterials. 2010 Sep;31(27):6909-16
pubmed: 20579724
Acta Biomater. 2017 Jan 1;47:193-202
pubmed: 27717912
Materials (Basel). 2013 Oct 22;6(10):4737-4757
pubmed: 28788357
J Biomech. 1990;23(11):1173-84
pubmed: 2277052
Acta Biomater. 2015 Mar;14:217-25
pubmed: 25500631
Biomater Sci. 2015 Feb;3(2):231-45
pubmed: 26218114
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Nov 1;68:445-448
pubmed: 27524040
Biomaterials. 2011 Oct;32(29):6875-82
pubmed: 21752463
Acta Biomater. 2019 Aug;94:610-626
pubmed: 31125727
Biofabrication. 2017 Apr 12;9(2):025001
pubmed: 28402967