The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction-A Retrospective Study.

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) internal bracing knee laxity primary ACL repair

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 18 06 2021
revised: 30 06 2021
accepted: 23 08 2021
entrez: 10 9 2021
pubmed: 11 9 2021
medline: 11 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR. In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively; Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR.
METHODS METHODS
In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded.
RESULTS RESULTS
Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively;
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34501400
pii: jcm10173948
doi: 10.3390/jcm10173948
pmc: PMC8432121
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3368-3377
pubmed: 30398894
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):285-90
pubmed: 23338663
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Nov 13;12(1):171
pubmed: 29132386
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(1):36-9
pubmed: 10663318
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):21-28
pubmed: 30612165
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:707168
pubmed: 25922839
Int Orthop. 2013 Nov;37(11):2305-11
pubmed: 24045909
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Oct-Nov;32(7):1731-5
pubmed: 15494340
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Aug 28;5(8):2325967117723886
pubmed: 28875154
Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9 Suppl):S49-57
pubmed: 20810092
Surgeon. 2017 Jun;15(3):161-168
pubmed: 27720666
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1085-1093
pubmed: 29373290
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 22;7(3):2325967118824356
pubmed: 30923725
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1762-70
pubmed: 23857883
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):171-6
pubmed: 19423416
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):571-8
pubmed: 19168805
Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2562-2569
pubmed: 27324969
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 May;103(3):363-366
pubmed: 28159678
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):589-595
pubmed: 28741153
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Sep 26;24:6823-6831
pubmed: 30257259
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 29;8(1):2325967119897421
pubmed: 32064293
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20(4):89-100
pubmed: 30520446
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Nov;20(11):2233-8
pubmed: 22231269
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Dec;16(12):1087-93
pubmed: 18712354
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Sep;9(5):302-6
pubmed: 11685363
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Aug;130(8):1001-6
pubmed: 20336305
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Sep 11;6(5):e1529-e1534
pubmed: 29354469
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018 Jun 1;30(2):121-127
pubmed: 29554717
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Oct;13(7):592-7
pubmed: 15645211
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Jan;29(1):49-55
pubmed: 10100121
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 28;8(1):2325967119897423
pubmed: 32064294
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):549-53
pubmed: 26972809
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):594-612
pubmed: 32014188
J Orthop Res. 2008 Nov;26(11):1500-5
pubmed: 18528857
Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;25(4):479-85
pubmed: 9240981
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):60-67
pubmed: 30382289
Knee. 2014 Mar;21(2):477-80
pubmed: 24405792
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 May;101(3):301-5
pubmed: 25755065
Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2162-71
pubmed: 26542201
Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Dec 20;8(12):e1561-e1568
pubmed: 31890538
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 May;19(5):699-706
pubmed: 21222101
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 May;125(4):217-21
pubmed: 15875231
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):793-8
pubmed: 27235522
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):40-48
pubmed: 27815015

Auteurs

Dawid Szwedowski (D)

Orthopaedic Arthroscopic Surgery International (OASI) Bioresearch Foundation, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Łukasz Paczesny (Ł)

Citomed Healthcare Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Orvit Clinic, Sklodowskiej 73, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.

Jan Zabrzyński (J)

Citomed Healthcare Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Orvit Clinic, Sklodowskiej 73, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.
Department of General Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.

Maciej Gagat (M)

Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Marcin Domżalski (M)

Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Veterans Memorial Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, 90-549 Lodz, Poland.

Gazi Huri (G)

Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe Universitesi, Ankara 06100, Turkey.

Wojciech Widuchowski (W)

Department of the Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy and Sports Traumatology, District Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, 41-940 Piekary Slaskie, Poland.

Classifications MeSH