Head-to-Head Comparison of Different Software Solutions for AVC Quantification Using Contrast-Enhanced MDCT.
aortic stenosis
aortic valve calcification
contrast-enhanced MDCT
inter-vendor variability
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Sep 2021
02 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
27
07
2021
revised:
23
08
2021
accepted:
01
09
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
11
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aortic valve calcification (AVC) in aortic stenosis patients has diagnostic and prognostic implications. Little is known about the interchangeability of AVC obtained from different multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) software solutions. Contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets of 50 randomly selected aortic stenosis patients were analysed using three different software vendors (3Mensio, CVI42, Syngo.Via). A subset of 10 patients were analysed twice for the estimation of intra-observer variability. Intra- and inter-observer variability were determined using the ICC reliability method, Bland-Altman analysis and coefficients of variation. No differences were revealed between the software solutions in the AVC calculations (3Mensio 941 ± 623, Syngo.Via 948 mm
Identifiants
pubmed: 34501418
pii: jcm10173970
doi: 10.3390/jcm10173970
pmc: PMC8432112
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0193746
pubmed: 29538467
Radiology. 1998 Sep;208(3):807-14
pubmed: 9722864
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 23;64(12):1202-13
pubmed: 25236511
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146
pubmed: 29555836
Heart. 2011 May;97(9):721-6
pubmed: 20720250
EuroIntervention. 2014 Nov;10(7):850-9
pubmed: 25415152
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;5(1):27-35
pubmed: 22109983
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Circulation. 2007 Jun 5;115(22):2856-64
pubmed: 17533183
Radiology. 1998 Aug;208(2):453-7
pubmed: 9680575
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705
pubmed: 30883058
Heart. 2010 Sep;96(18):1463-8
pubmed: 20813727
Clin Radiol. 2015 Sep;70(9):989-98
pubmed: 26139384
Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):70-7
pubmed: 22771886
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 17;59(3):235-43
pubmed: 22240128
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;108(10):1470-7
pubmed: 21855831
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr;11(2):99-104
pubmed: 28209366
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:267-272
pubmed: 30017520
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:155-6
pubmed: 25828343
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1231-43
pubmed: 12831818
Heart. 2021 Jan 29;:
pubmed: 33514522
Am Heart J. 2020 Jul;225:138-148
pubmed: 32502877
Eur Heart J. 2020 Feb 1;41(6):733-735
pubmed: 32031223
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715
pubmed: 30883053
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):e004077
pubmed: 27009468
Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul;19(7):1661-8
pubmed: 19238389
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 May 10;22(6):626-635
pubmed: 33247903
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May;17(5):576-84
pubmed: 26160399
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 31;343(9):611-7
pubmed: 10965007
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1171-1181, e2
pubmed: 26209911
Circulation. 2002 Dec 10;106(24):3006-8
pubmed: 12473543
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Sep 1;78(3):446-55
pubmed: 21793166
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Mar - Apr;13(2):92-98
pubmed: 30665879
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun 06;6:2048004017712862
pubmed: 28660071