Family E-Chat Group Use Was Associated with Family Wellbeing and Personal Happiness in Hong Kong Adults amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.
family communication
family e-chat group
family wellbeing
information and communication technology
instant messaging
personal happiness
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 08 2021
30 08 2021
Historique:
received:
18
07
2021
revised:
18
08
2021
accepted:
27
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
15
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Instant messaging (IM) is increasingly used for family communication amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence remains scarce on how family e-chat groups were used and their associations with family and individual wellbeing amidst the pandemic. The numbers of family e-chat groups, functions used, and messages sent and received daily in groups were reported by 4890 adults in May 2020, and their associations with family wellbeing and personal happiness and the mediation effect of family communication quality were examined. Results showed that sending/receiving text messages was most commonly used, followed by receiving/sending photos/pictures, making voice calls, receiving/sending short videos and voice messages, and making video calls. Women and older people used more non-text functions. Higher levels of family wellbeing and personal happiness were associated with having more groups, receiving/sending photos/pictures, video calls, more IM functions used, and more IM messages received/sent daily. Forty-six point two to seventy-five point five percent of their associations with more groups and more functions used were mediated by family communication quality. People having more family e-chat groups and using more IM functions may be more resilient amidst the pandemic, while those without or with low use of family e-chat groups amidst the pandemic would need more attention and assistance in the presence of social distancing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34501729
pii: ijerph18179139
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179139
pmc: PMC8431295
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust
ID : NA
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 15;23(3):e18876
pubmed: 33720034
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:431-433
pubmed: 32947051
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Jun;22(3):344-54
pubmed: 18540763
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 24;17(8):e207
pubmed: 26303434
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6S):S89-S99
pubmed: 32446614
Am Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(5):631-643
pubmed: 32437181
J Behav Addict. 2019 Sep 1;8(3):412-419
pubmed: 31394912
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Apr;14(4):253-8
pubmed: 21067280
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Jun;22(3):475-83
pubmed: 18540776
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jun;20(6):346-354
pubmed: 28622031
Autism. 2016 Apr;20(3):262-75
pubmed: 25948599
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155789
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jul;120:106717
pubmed: 34751201
Health Educ Res. 2012 Oct;27(5):767-79
pubmed: 22907531
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Nov 23;4(4):e57
pubmed: 29170145
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):377-87
pubmed: 15110427
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073
pubmed: 32750005
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):
pubmed: 33572977
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Oct 20;3:21
pubmed: 14567763
Qual Life Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):535-543
pubmed: 30284182