EXecutive-Functions Innovative Tool (EXIT 360°): A Usability and User Experience Study of an Original 360°-Based Assessment Instrument.
360° environment
assessment
engagement
executive function
usability
user experience
virtual reality
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2021
31 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
29
07
2021
revised:
24
08
2021
accepted:
30
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over the last few decades, several studies have shown the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of VR-based instruments in the early evaluation of executive dysfunction (ED) in psychiatric and neurologic conditions. Due to the negative impact of ED in everyday functioning, identifying innovative strategies for evaluating ED allows clinicians to detect executive impairment early and minimize its effects. This work aimed to test the usability and user experience (UX) of EXecutive-functions Innovative Tool 360° (EXIT 360°), a 360°-based tool for assessing ED. Seventy-six healthy subjects underwent an evaluation that involved (1) usability assessment using System Usability Scale and (2) evaluation of UX using the ICT-Sense of Presence and UX Questionnaire. Results showed a satisfactory level of usability (mean = 75.9 ± 12.8), with good scores for usability and learnability. As regards UX, EXIT 360° showed an absence of negative effects (mean = 1.79 ± 0.95) and high scores in ecological validity (mean = 4.32 ± 0.54) and engagement (mean = 3.76 ± 0.56). Moreover, it obtained good scores in efficiency (mean = 1.84 ± 0.84), originality (mean = 2.49 ± 0.71), and attractiveness (mean = 1.93 ± 0.98). Interestingly, demographic characteristics and technological expertise had no impact on the performance (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34502758
pii: s21175867
doi: 10.3390/s21175867
pmc: PMC8433836
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 22;7(1):16000
pubmed: 29167494
Neurol Sci. 2015 Apr;36(4):585-91
pubmed: 25380622
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 19;18(7):
pubmed: 30029502
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 5;9(1):5690
pubmed: 30952936
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(4):721-734
pubmed: 29254114
Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 12;15:622095
pubmed: 33912001
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(2):113-23
pubmed: 23157431
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;23(2):201-16
pubmed: 18096360
Neuropsychol Rev. 2003 Dec;13(4):181-97
pubmed: 15000225
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Nov 03;12(12):752-62
pubmed: 22048061
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 May 13;:1-10
pubmed: 32400210
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 05;8:405
pubmed: 25538578
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Jan;13(1):143-52
pubmed: 17166313
J Pers. 1994 Mar;62(1):119-42
pubmed: 8169757
Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1207-1220
pubmed: 32450782
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
pubmed: 23020641
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 11;9:660
pubmed: 26696869
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jul;27(5):808-833
pubmed: 26558414
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 Jul;28(5):689-708
pubmed: 26317526
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 02;9:1878
pubmed: 30333780
Schizophr Res. 2009 Dec;115(2-3):270-7
pubmed: 19850451
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Apr 08;14:93
pubmed: 32322194