Comparison of Low and Full Dose Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction (from a National Registry).
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ administration & dosage
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Factor Xa Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Israel
Kidney Diseases
/ complications
Male
Prospective Studies
Pyrazoles
/ administration & dosage
Pyridones
/ administration & dosage
Registries
Stroke
/ etiology
Warfarin
/ administration & dosage
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2021
15 11 2021
Historique:
received:
22
05
2021
revised:
01
08
2021
accepted:
03
08
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is robust. However, the efficacy and safety of different dosage in patients with renal dysfunction is still a clinical challenge. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with apixaban in its different doses. A multicenter prospective cohort study, where consecutive eligible apixaban or warfarin treated patients with NVAF and renal impairment, were registered. Patients were followed-up for clinical events over a mean period of 1 year. Analyses were performed according to the dose of apixaban given, with consideration to the standard indications for dose reduction. Primary outcome was a composite of 1-year mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding and myocardial infarction, while secondary outcomes included those components separated. Among the study population (n = 2,140), risk of composite outcome was significantly lower in the high dose apixaban group (10%, n = 491) than the low dose group (18%, n = 673) and the warfarin group (18%, n = 976) p <0.001. Results of 1-year mortality were similar. Apixaban dosing analysis revealed 65% of patients were appropriately dosed, while 31% were under-dosed and 4% were over-dosed. Furthermore, 53% of patients treated with low dose apixaban were under-dosed. Propensity score analysis revealed that patients who were appropriately treated with low-dose apixaban had a trend towards better composite outcome and mortality than 1:1 matched warfarin treated patients (18% vs 24%, p = 0.09 and 16% vs 23%, p = 0.06, respectively). Overall, appropriately dosed apixaban treated patients at any dose had significantly better outcomes than matched warfarin treated patients (composite outcome probability of 13.1% vs 18.6%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, apixaban at any dose is a reasonable alternative to warfarin in patients with renal impairment, possibly associated with improved outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34503821
pii: S0002-9149(21)00781-5
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.022
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Factor Xa Inhibitors
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyridones
0
apixaban
3Z9Y7UWC1J
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
87-93Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures Ilan Goldenberg reports financial support was provided by Pfizer Inc. Ilan Goldenberg reports a relationship with Pfizer Inc that includes: funding grants. Alon Barsheshet and Robert Klempfner have received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Bayer.