Capnography use in the critical care setting: why do clinicians fail to implement this safety measure?
airway management
capnography
critical care
safety
tracheal intubation
Journal
British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
09
08
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tracheal intubation is among the most frequently performed manoeuvres in the critical care setting, and can be life-saving in critical illness, though also associated with serious adverse events such as oesophageal intubation or tracheal tube obstruction, displacement, or disconnection from the ventilator. A key finding of the 4th National Audit Project (NAP4) was identification of waveform capnography as the single intervention with the highest potential for reducing morbidity and mortality during tracheal intubation and maintenance of an artificial airway. In the INTUBE study, penetration of capnography into ICUs was low, and was not in use in 70% of the episodes of oesophageal intubation. To reduce harm and avoidable death, there is a need for a global initiative to increase access to and use of capnography in ICUs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34503831
pii: S0007-0912(21)00517-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
661-664Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of interest VR has no conflicts of interest to declare. TMC is the Director of the National Audit Projects at the Royal College of Anaesthetists and has contributed to the Royal College of Anaesthetists' ‘no trace: wrong place’ campaign. TMC is a member of the associate editorial board of the British Journal of Anaesthesia.