Stress distribution pattern in the distal radioulnar joint before and after ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 09 2021
09 09 2021
Historique:
received:
07
02
2021
accepted:
24
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome potentially leads to degenerative changes of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). This study was performed to evaluate the effect of the sigmoid notch morphology on the stress distribution pattern of the DRUJ using computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM). We reviewed the pre- and postoperative transverse CT images of 15 wrists that had undergone USO. The examined wrists were classified into two groups based on the sigmoid notch morphology: the linear-type notch (type L) and the curved-type notch (type C). We calculated and statistically compared the percentage of the high-density area (%HDA) in each divided region of the sigmoid notch. In type L, %HDA was significantly larger in the distal-dorsal region of the sigmoid notch before USO. Postoperatively, in type L, no specific regions showed a significantly different %HDA. In type C, %HDA was significantly larger in the distal-volar region of the sigmoid notch before USO. Postoperatively, %HDA of type C was significantly larger in the proximal-volar region. Our results suggest that in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, morphological evaluation of the sigmoid notch can serve as a predictor of osteoarthritis in the DRUJ with or without USO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34504202
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97398-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-97398-x
pmc: PMC8429458
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17891Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Int Orthop. 2012 Sep;36(9):1871-6
pubmed: 22777383
J Hand Surg Br. 2006 Apr;31(2):221-5
pubmed: 16337322
J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Jul;18(4):713-6
pubmed: 8349988
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Sep;23(5):904-8
pubmed: 9763270
Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Dec;3(4):295-301
pubmed: 22162792
J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Dec;17(6):678-81
pubmed: 1484254
J Hand Surg Br. 1998 Dec;23(6):754-7
pubmed: 9888675
Nature. 1973 Aug 3;244(5414):303-4
pubmed: 4270399
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Apr;(229):302-7
pubmed: 3349690
J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):948-952
pubmed: 30431007
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Jun;44(5):496-502
pubmed: 30309275
J Hand Surg Am. 1996 May;21(3):406-11
pubmed: 8724470
Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18(7):507-12
pubmed: 2588028
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):46-55
pubmed: 1735232
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Feb;33(2):198-205
pubmed: 18294540
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:215-9
pubmed: 17906587
J Hand Surg Br. 1996 Oct;21(5):581-6
pubmed: 9230938
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):719-26
pubmed: 16039364
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Oct;25(5):434-8
pubmed: 10991806
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):989-94
pubmed: 26831631
J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Jul;10(4):482-91
pubmed: 4020058
J Hand Surg Br. 1996 Oct;21(5):587-94
pubmed: 9230939
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Mar;30(2):343-50
pubmed: 15781358
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jun;45(5):527-529
pubmed: 32122237
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jun;470(6):1534-9
pubmed: 22290131