Underlying hemodynamic differences are associated with responses to tilt testing.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 09 2021
09 09 2021
Historique:
received:
24
04
2021
accepted:
23
08
2021
entrez:
10
9
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
16
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aim of this study was to explore whether differences in resting hemodynamic parameters may be associated with tilt test results in unexplained syncope. We analyzed age, gender, systolic (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) by merging three large databases of patients considered likely to be of vasovagal reflex etiology, comparing patients who had tilt-induced reflex response with those who did not. Tilt-induced reflex response was defined as spontaneous symptom reproduction with characteristic hypotension and bradycardia. Relationship of demographics and baseline supine BP to tilt-test were assessed using logistic regression models. Individual records of 5236 patients (45% males; mean age: 60 ± 22 years; 32% prescribed antihypertensive therapy) were analyzed. Tilt-positive (n = 3129, 60%) vs tilt-negative patients had lower SBP (127.2 ± 17.9 vs 129.7 ± 18.0 mmHg, p < 0.001), DBP (76.2 ± 11.5 vs 77.7 ± 11.7 mmHg, p < 0.001) and HR (68.0 ± 11.5 vs 70.5 ± 12.5 bpm, p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, tilt-test positivity was independently associated with younger age (Odds ratio (OR) per 10 years:1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.07, p = 0.014), SBP ≤ 128 mmHg (OR:1.27; 95%CI, 1.11-1.44, p < 0.001), HR ≤ 69 bpm (OR:1.32; 95%CI, 1.17-1.50, p < 0.001), and absence of hypertension (OR:1.58; 95%CI, 1.38-1.81, p < 0.001). In conclusion, among patients with suspected reflex syncope, younger age, lower blood pressure and lower heart rate are associated with positive tilt-test result.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34504263
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97503-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-97503-0
pmc: PMC8429732
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17894Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1674-8
pubmed: 27450157
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Nov;17(11):1172-6
pubmed: 17074006
Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 1;35(33):2211-2
pubmed: 24980488
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):289-296
pubmed: 30431678
J Hypertens. 2021 Jul 1;39(7):1319-1325
pubmed: 33560050
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb;7(1):10-6
pubmed: 24336948
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
Lancet. 1986 Jun 14;1(8494):1352-5
pubmed: 2872472
Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 07;10:184
pubmed: 30899228
Europace. 2015 Mar;17(3):345-9
pubmed: 25662986
J Med Eng Technol. 1998 Jan-Feb;22(1):37-43
pubmed: 9491357
Heart. 2003 Sep;89(9):1104-9
pubmed: 12923045
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 18;8(12):e012559
pubmed: 31208249
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;30(12):2936-2943
pubmed: 31578800
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jun;15(6):921-929
pubmed: 29246828
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Feb;12(2 Pt 2):50S-55S
pubmed: 10090295
Heart. 2017 Mar;103(6):449-455
pubmed: 27664002
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212521
pubmed: 33783519
Circulation. 2012 May 29;125(21):2566-71
pubmed: 22565936
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018 Jun;7(2):95-102
pubmed: 29967681
Am J Physiol. 1996 Jun;270(6 Pt 2):H2050-9
pubmed: 8764256
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948
pubmed: 29562304
Circ Res. 2020 Aug 14;127(5):e126-e138
pubmed: 32460687
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1535-1542
pubmed: 29036615
Europace. 2000 Oct;2(4):339-42
pubmed: 11194602
Am J Hypertens. 2009 Apr;22(4):378-83
pubmed: 19180062
Clin Auton Res. 2017 Aug;27(4):253-261
pubmed: 28669087