Planned Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Adversely Impacts Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Performed with Thymoglobulin for Myeloid Malignancy.
Antithymocyte globulin
Filgrastim
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Thymoglobulin
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
17
07
2021
revised:
24
08
2021
accepted:
31
08
2021
pubmed:
11
9
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
10
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The in vivo depletion of recipient and donor T lymphocytes using antithymocyte globulin (ATG; Thymoglobulin) is widely adopted in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to reduce the incidence of both graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, excess toxicity to donor lymphocytes may hamper immune reconstitution, compromising antitumor effects and increasing infection. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered early after HCT may increase ATG-mediated lymphotoxicity. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an interaction between ATG and post-transplantation granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on allogeneic HCT outcomes, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry. We studied patients age ≥18 years with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received Thymoglobulin-containing preparative regimens for HLA-matched sibling/unrelated or mismatched unrelated donor HCT between 2010 and 2018. The effect of planned G-CSF that was started between pretransplantation day 3 and post-transplantation day 12 was studied in comparison with transplantations that did not include G-CSF. Cox regression models were built to identify risk factors associated with outcomes at 1 year after transplantation. A total of 874 patients met the study eligibility criteria, of whom 459 (53%) received planned G-CSF. HCT with planned G-CSF was associated with a significantly increased risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03; P <.0001; 21% versus 12%) compared to HCT without G-CSF. The 6-month incidence of viral infection was higher with G-CSF (56% versus 47%; P = .007), with a particular increase in Epstein-Barr virus infections (19% versus 11%; P = .002). The observed higher NRM with planned G-CSF led to lower overall survival (HR, 1.52; P = .0005; 61% versus 72%). There was no difference in GVHD risk between the treatment groups. We performed 2 subgroup analyses showing that our findings held true in patients age ≥50 years and in centers where G-CSF was used in some, but not all, patients. In allogeneic peripheral blood HCT performed with Thymoglobulin for AML and MDS, G-CSF administered early post-transplantation resulted in a 2-fold increase in NRM and a 10% absolute decrement in survival. The use of planned G-CSF in the early post-transplantation period should be carefully considered on an individual patient basis, weighing any perceived benefits against these risks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34507002
pii: S2666-6367(21)01220-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.031
pmc: PMC8671234
mid: NIHMS1739558
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antilymphocyte Serum
0
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
143011-72-7
thymoglobulin
D7RD81HE4W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
993.e1-993.e8Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U10 HL069294
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U24 CA076518
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.
Références
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 May;12(5):560-5
pubmed: 16635791
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 20;35(36):4003-4011
pubmed: 29040031
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Jan;101(1):87-93
pubmed: 20724020
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 14;8(7):10871-10882
pubmed: 28107198
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8
pubmed: 7581076
Blood Adv. 2018 Mar 13;2(5):565-574
pubmed: 29535105
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e77925
pubmed: 24324576
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1989 May;4(3):247-54
pubmed: 2659110
Blood. 1997 Oct 15;90(8):3098-105
pubmed: 9376591
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jan;47(1):73-81
pubmed: 21358682
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007 Nov;88(2):95-101
pubmed: 17850917
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Nov;24(11):2216-2223
pubmed: 30006305
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;54(7):1094-1106
pubmed: 30446739
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Oct;18(4):817-9
pubmed: 8899204
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 9;329(11):757-61
pubmed: 7688862
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Feb;6(2):e89-e99
pubmed: 30709437
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):959-70
pubmed: 25482864
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;55(6):1093-1102
pubmed: 31969678
Blood. 1993 Dec 1;82(11):3265-72
pubmed: 7694676
Stat Med. 1999 Jun 30;18(12):1489-500
pubmed: 10398287
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Oct;22(7):631-7
pubmed: 9818689
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Aug;58(8):1840-1848
pubmed: 27951736
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Mar;43(5):351-6
pubmed: 19182834
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):164-173
pubmed: 26723083
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr;4(4):e183-e191
pubmed: 28330607
Lancet Haematol. 2015 May;2(5):e194-203
pubmed: 26688094
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Dec;23(12):2184-2191
pubmed: 28864138
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Jun;4(6):e293-e301
pubmed: 28583289