Individual word activation and word frequency effects during the processing of opaque idiomatic expressions.
Idioms
form-meaning interaction
priming
word frequency
word naming
Journal
Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
ISSN: 1747-0226
Titre abrégé: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101259775
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
12
9
2021
medline:
20
4
2022
entrez:
11
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Idiom processing studies have paid considerable attention to the relationship between idiomatic expressions as a whole and their constituent words. Although most research focused on the semantic properties of the constituent words, their orthographic form could also play a role in processing. To test this, we assessed both form and meaning activation of individual words during the processing of opaque idioms. In two primed word naming experiments, Dutch native speakers silently read sentences word by word and then named the last word of the sentence. This target word was embedded in either an idiomatic or a literal context and was expected and correct in this context (COR), semantically related (REL) to the expected word, or unrelated (UNREL) to the expected word. The correct target word in the idiomatic context was always part of an opaque idiom. Faster naming latencies for the idiom-final noun than for the unrelated target in the idiomatic context indicated that the idiom was activated as a whole during processing. In addition, semantic facilitation was observed in the literal context (COR < REL < UNREL), but not in the idiomatic context (COR < REL = UNREL). This is evidence that the idiom-final noun was not activated at the meaning level of representation. However, an inhibitory effect of orthographic word frequency of the idiom-final noun indicated that the idiom-final noun was activated at the form level. These results provide evidence in favour of a hybrid model of idiom processing in which the individual words and the idiom as a whole interact on form and meaning levels of representation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34507505
doi: 10.1177/17470218211047995
pmc: PMC9016674
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1004-1020Références
Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1075
pubmed: 31139119
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 09;7:1350
pubmed: 27667979
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1317-26
pubmed: 18823214
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Feb;37(1):139-47
pubmed: 16097354
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):57-71
pubmed: 9046870
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May;25(5):762-76
pubmed: 23249356
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):155-72
pubmed: 15922167
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1103-21
pubmed: 18927029
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):491-505
pubmed: 17521377
Mem Cognit. 1973 Sep;1(3):343-6
pubmed: 24214567
Mem Cognit. 1989 Jan;17(1):58-68
pubmed: 2913457
Psychophysiology. 2002 Mar;39(2):133-46
pubmed: 12212662
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):643-50
pubmed: 20805586
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):198-205
pubmed: 18411543
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):624-34
pubmed: 10682205
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
pubmed: 17254636
Mem Cognit. 1980 Mar;8(2):149-56
pubmed: 7382816