Free word association perceptions of red meats; beef is 'yummy', bison is 'lean game meat', horse is 'off limits'.

Beef Bison Familiarity Food involvement Free word association Horse Meat Variety seeking

Journal

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)
ISSN: 1873-7145
Titre abrégé: Food Res Int
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9210143

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 19 11 2020
revised: 10 07 2021
accepted: 11 07 2021
entrez: 11 9 2021
pubmed: 12 9 2021
medline: 21 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Reduced consumption of conventional red meats due to environmental and health concerns may create interest in less familiar red meats from alternative animal species. The objective of this study was to identify perceptions of three red meats; beef, a familiar meat, and bison and horse meat, less familiar red meat alternatives. A total of 145 western Canadian participants completed an on-line survey that included a free word association task, food variety seeking and food involvement scales, and meat consumption and demographic questions. The free word association yielded 41 word categories of diverging perceptions of the 3 meats. Beef was described with positive sensory attributes and well-liked foods, yet with environmental, ethical and production concerns, reflecting the 'meat eaters' paradox'. Bison was perceived as a lean game meat, suggesting a lack of awareness of current bison production and retail availability. Horse meat was unfamiliar to 80% of the participants. Horse meat was acknowledged to be consumed in other regions, however as a companion animal and pet, the dominant perception of horse meat was that it was unacceptable for eating. Participants were clustered into four groups based on the combined food-related personality traits of variety seeking and food involvement. The high food involvement cluster associated bison with positive eating quality attributes and may be amenable to its consumption when provided with accurate information about bison production.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34507752
pii: S0963-9969(21)00507-X
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110608
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110608

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ibironke O Popoola (IO)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL T6G 2P5, Canada.

Sven Anders (S)

Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, 523 General Services Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL T6G 2H1, Canada.

Michelle M Feuereisen (MM)

Institute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, Molecular Food Technology, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 19b, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.

Mariarosaria Savarese (M)

EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Wendy V Wismer (WV)

Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL T6G 2P5, Canada. Electronic address: wwismer@ualberta.ca.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH