The public's attitude towards doctors' use of Twitter and perceived professionalism: an exploratory study.


Journal

Clinical medicine (London, England)
ISSN: 1473-4893
Titre abrégé: Clin Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101092853

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2021
Historique:
entrez: 11 9 2021
pubmed: 12 9 2021
medline: 24 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Medical professionals use social media to interact with other healthcare professionals, discuss medical issues and promote healthcare information. These platforms have tremendous power to promote healthcare messages but also have potential to damage the profession if used inappropriately. It is currently unknown how others perceive medical doctors' Twitter activity and, therefore, we conducted an online survey exploring these views. We used a Google Forms questionnaire consisting of 21 questions, which we distributed on Twitter, exploring doctors', patients', the public's and other healthcare professionals' views of doctors' Twitter activities. We investigated factors that were associated with mistrust by univariate and multivariate analysis. Seven-hundred and twenty-six respondents completed the survey. By univariate analysis, a higher proportion of non-doctors reported witnessing unprofessional behaviour and potential breaches of patient confidentiality compared with doctors (p<0.01). In addition, a significantly higher proportion of non-doctors felt that doctors' Twitter accounts should be monitored by both their employer and regulator when compared with doctors. By multivariate analysis, the main predictor of mistrust in the profession were those that had previously witnessed unprofessional behaviour (odds ratio 2.70; 95% confidence interval 2.08-3.33; p<0.01). There are discrepancies in how doctors and non-doctors view Twitter activity and significant mistrust in the profession was brought about by doctors' Twitter activity. To help limit this, adherence to current guidelines set out by the General Medical Council and British Medical Association is vital and doctors should be cautious about how their Twitter activity is professionally perceived by others before posting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34507932
pii: 21/5/e475
doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0357
pmc: PMC8439510
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e475-e479

Informations de copyright

© Royal College of Physicians 2021. All rights reserved.

Références

Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):184
pubmed: 21436925
J Clin Med. 2018 May 28;7(6):
pubmed: 29843360
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Nov 27;11(4):e48
pubmed: 19945947
BMJ. 2018 Sep 17;362:k3947
pubmed: 30224352
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;56(3):453-62
pubmed: 23903375
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Sep 21;11:473-479
pubmed: 30275699
Respirology. 2020 Jun;25(6):578-579
pubmed: 32391603
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Feb;40(2):183-190
pubmed: 31863133
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;18(8):517-518
pubmed: 33893456
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Aug;87(8):566
pubmed: 19704998

Auteurs

Yakup Kilic (Y)

Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK.

Devkishan Chauhan (D)

Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK.

Pearl Avery (P)

Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK.

Nigel Horwood (N)

no affiliation.

Radislav Nakov (R)

University Hospital Tsaritsa Yoanna, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Ben Disney (B)

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Jonathan P Segal (JP)

Hillingdon Hospital, Uxbridge, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH