Predictors of short-term impulsive and compulsive behaviour after subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease.
Journal
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
ISSN: 1468-330X
Titre abrégé: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985191R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
20
06
2021
pubmed:
13
9
2021
medline:
4
1
2022
entrez:
12
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effects of subthalamic stimulation (subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation, STN-DBS) on impulsive and compulsive behaviours (ICB) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are understudied. To investigate clinical predictors of STN-DBS effects on ICB. In this prospective, open-label, multicentre study in patients with PD undergoing bilateral STN-DBS, we assessed patients preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Clinical scales included the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in PD-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS), PD Questionnaire-8, Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS), Unified PD Rating Scale in addition to levodopa-equivalent daily dose total (LEDD-total) and dopamine agonists (LEDD-DA). Changes at follow-up were analysed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni method). We explored predictors of QUIP-RS changes using correlations and linear regressions. Finally, we dichotomised patients into 'QUIP-RS improvement or worsening' and analysed between-group differences. We included 55 patients aged 61.7 years±8.4 with 9.8 years±4.6 PD duration. QUIP-RS cut-offs and psychiatric assessments identified patients with preoperative ICB. In patients with ICB, QUIP-RS improved significantly. However, we observed considerable interindividual variability of clinically relevant QUIP-RS outcomes as 27.3% experienced worsening and 29.1% an improvement. In post hoc analyses, higher baseline QUIP-RS and lower baseline LEDD-DA were associated with greater QUIP-RS improvements. Additionally, the 'QUIP-RS worsening' group had more severe baseline impairment in the NMSS attention/memory domain. Our results show favourable ICB outcomes in patients with higher preoperative ICB severity and lower preoperative DA doses, and worse outcomes in patients with more severe baseline attention/memory deficits. These findings emphasise the need for comprehensive non-motor and motor symptoms assessments in patients undergoing STN-DBS. DRKS00006735.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The effects of subthalamic stimulation (subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation, STN-DBS) on impulsive and compulsive behaviours (ICB) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are understudied.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate clinical predictors of STN-DBS effects on ICB.
METHODS
In this prospective, open-label, multicentre study in patients with PD undergoing bilateral STN-DBS, we assessed patients preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Clinical scales included the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in PD-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS), PD Questionnaire-8, Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS), Unified PD Rating Scale in addition to levodopa-equivalent daily dose total (LEDD-total) and dopamine agonists (LEDD-DA). Changes at follow-up were analysed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni method). We explored predictors of QUIP-RS changes using correlations and linear regressions. Finally, we dichotomised patients into 'QUIP-RS improvement or worsening' and analysed between-group differences.
RESULTS
We included 55 patients aged 61.7 years±8.4 with 9.8 years±4.6 PD duration. QUIP-RS cut-offs and psychiatric assessments identified patients with preoperative ICB. In patients with ICB, QUIP-RS improved significantly. However, we observed considerable interindividual variability of clinically relevant QUIP-RS outcomes as 27.3% experienced worsening and 29.1% an improvement. In post hoc analyses, higher baseline QUIP-RS and lower baseline LEDD-DA were associated with greater QUIP-RS improvements. Additionally, the 'QUIP-RS worsening' group had more severe baseline impairment in the NMSS attention/memory domain.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show favourable ICB outcomes in patients with higher preoperative ICB severity and lower preoperative DA doses, and worse outcomes in patients with more severe baseline attention/memory deficits. These findings emphasise the need for comprehensive non-motor and motor symptoms assessments in patients undergoing STN-DBS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
DRKS00006735.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34510000
pii: jnnp-2021-326131
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326131
pmc: PMC8606469
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1313-1318Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: AS is funded by the Gusyk programme of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne and has received funding from the Prof. Klaus Thiemann Foundation. PL was funded by the SUCCESS-Programme of the University of Marburg, the Parkinson’s Foundation and the Stiftung zur Förderung junger Neurowissenschaftler. STJ was funded by the Prof. Klaus Thiemann Foundation. JNP-S has received travel grants from Boston Scientific. LK reports academic grants from EU Horizon 2020 and from the excellence strategy of the Technical University Dresden, Germany; habilitation funding for women from the Medical Faculty of the Technical University Dresden, Germany. MTB received speaker’s honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott (formerly St. Jude), GE Medical, UCB, Apothekerverband Köln e.V. and Bial as well as research funding from the Felgenhauer-Stiftung, Forschungspool Klinische Studien (University of Cologne), Horizon 2020 (Gondola), Medtronic (ODIS), and Boston Scientific and advisory honoraria for the IQWIG. GRF serves as an editorial board member of Cortex, Neurological Research and Practice, NeuroImage: Clinical, Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, and DGNeurologie; receives royalties from the publication of the books Funktionelle MRT in Psychiatrie und Neurologie, Neurologische Differentialdiagnose and SOP Neurologie; received honoraria for speaking engagements from Bayer, Desitin, Ergo DKV, Forum für medizinische Fortbildung FomF, GSK, Medica Academy Messe Düsseldorf, Medicbrain Healthcare, Novartis, Pfizer and Sportärztebund NRW. PM-M has received honoraria from Editorial Viguera and Takeda Pharmaceuticals for lecturing in courses; from Britannia for writing an article in their Parkinson’s Disease Medical Journal-Kinetic; and from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) for management of the Programme on Rating Scales. Grants from the MDS for development and validation of the MDS-NMS. KRC has received funding from Parkinson’s UK (funding ID Parkinson’s UK K-1406), NIHR, UCB and the European Union; he received honoraria from UCB, Abbott, Britannia, US Worldmeds, and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; and acted as a consultant for AbbVie, UCB and Britannia. VV-V is a member of the advisory boards and reports consultancies for Boston Scientific. LT reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from SAPIENS Steering Brain Stimulation, Medtronic, Boston Scientific and St. Jude Medical. DW reports no financial disclosures. HSD was funded by the EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND), the Prof. Klaus Thiemann Foundation, and the Felgenhauer Foundation and has received honoraria by Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Stadapharm.
Références
Neuromodulation. 2018 Aug;21(6):532-540
pubmed: 29266613
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;44:13-17
pubmed: 28827010
Neurology. 1967 May;17(5):427-42
pubmed: 6067254
Mov Disord. 2003 Jul;18(7):738-50
pubmed: 12815652
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2012 Mar;5(2):105-17
pubmed: 22435075
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29768
pubmed: 22295068
Brain. 2020 Jul 1;143(7):2235-2254
pubmed: 32568370
Ann Neurol. 2008 Dec;64 Suppl 2:S93-100
pubmed: 19127573
Mov Disord. 2007 Oct 15;22(13):1901-11
pubmed: 17674410
Brain Stimul. 2020 Nov - Dec;13(6):1697-1705
pubmed: 33038595
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(4):265-70
pubmed: 26066569
J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 07;11(8):
pubmed: 34442417
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):840-4
pubmed: 24434037
Eur J Neurol. 2019 Feb;26(2):222-e17
pubmed: 30107062
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Oct;23(10):1556-65
pubmed: 27425586
Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 26;10:86
pubmed: 30863353
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;14(2):109-14
pubmed: 11845014
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):867-874
pubmed: 29655587
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Aug;23(8):1255-61
pubmed: 27170229
J Neurol. 2014 May;261(5):936-42
pubmed: 24609972
Neuroscience. 2013 Jun 14;240:106-16
pubmed: 23454540
J Neurol. 2020 Jun;267(6):1830-1841
pubmed: 32152689
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):868-74
pubmed: 23447648
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 15;9(1):14795
pubmed: 31616015
Mov Disord. 2021 Mar;36(3):750-757
pubmed: 33022101
Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1109-e1120
pubmed: 30737338
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jun;27(6):944-950
pubmed: 32048392
J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(1):323-335
pubmed: 33074192
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):896-908
pubmed: 16943402
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015 May;86(5):562-4
pubmed: 25012201
Neurol Sci. 2008 Dec;29 Suppl 5:S375-6
pubmed: 19381766
Mov Disord. 2009 Jul 30;24(10):1461-7
pubmed: 19452562
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021 Jun 8;7(1):48
pubmed: 34103534
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr 23;14:47
pubmed: 32390809
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):78-85
pubmed: 26385442
Brain. 2019 Nov 1;142(11):3592-3604
pubmed: 31553039
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):395-407
pubmed: 12812812
Mov Disord. 2012 Feb;27(2):242-7
pubmed: 22134954
Neurology. 2013 Feb 26;80(9):800-9
pubmed: 23365054
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;91(7):687-694
pubmed: 32371534
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Aug 6;:1-4
pubmed: 34357840
Mov Disord. 2011 Nov;26(13):2371-80
pubmed: 21735480