Common Morality Principles in Biomedical Ethics: Responses to Critics.
common morality
human rights
medical ethics
moral change
principles
principlism
Journal
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
ISSN: 1469-2147
Titre abrégé: Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208482
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
13
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After briefly sketching common-morality principlism, as presented in Principles of Biomedical Ethics, this paper responds to two recent sets of challenges to this framework. The first challenge claims that medical ethics is autonomous and unique and thus not a form of, or justified or guided by, a common morality or by any external morality or moral theory. The second challenge denies that there is a common morality and insists that futile efforts to develop common-morality approaches to bioethics limit diversity and prevent needed moral change. This paper argues that these two critiques fundamentally fail because they significantly misunderstand their target and because their proposed alternatives have major deficiencies and encounter insurmountable problems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34511156
doi: 10.1017/S0963180121000566
pii: S0963180121000566
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
164-176Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn