Simulation-based assessment of supply chain resilience with consideration of recovery strategies in the COVID-19 pandemic context.

COVID-19 Simulation Supply chain disruption Supply chain resilience Supply chain risk management

Journal

Computers & industrial engineering
ISSN: 1879-0550
Titre abrégé: Comput Ind Eng
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101729445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Historique:
entrez: 13 9 2021
pubmed: 14 9 2021
medline: 14 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, many firms lacked a strategy to cope with disruptions and maintain resiliency. In this study, we develop a measurement method to evaluate the impact of resilience strategies in a multi-stage supply chain (SC) in the presence of a pandemic. For the first time, we propose a method to deduce quantitative resilience assessment from simulation. We implement two resilience strategies, i.e., prepositioning extra-inventory and a backup supplier, and then we simulate its impact on SC resilience and financial performance. The simulation results indicate that the extra inventory leads to a higher resilience than a backup supplier but costs more for the given contextual setting. Finally, we examine the demand fulfillment and observe that the extra-inventory strategy allows for a higher service level, confirming our resilience simulations. We discuss the managerial implications of these findings on the descriptive and predictive analysis levels. Decision-makers can utilize our model and findings to develop a response plan in the occurrence of a pandemic or any long-duration high magnitude disruption. Also, scholars and managers can use our proposed method to measure SC resiliency from simulation in any disruption.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34511708
doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107593
pii: S0360-8352(21)00497-6
pmc: PMC8424774
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

107593

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Expert Syst Appl. 2020 Dec 15;161:113649
pubmed: 32834558
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb 27;:
pubmed: 33638786
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 5;352(18):1839-42
pubmed: 15872196
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):577-587
pubmed: 32493967
J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Oct;91(4):572-9
pubmed: 11576290
Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020 Aug;102:293-299
pubmed: 32834502
Circulation. 2020 May 26;141(21):1667-1669
pubmed: 32208975
Lancet HIV. 2020 Sep;7(9):e629-e640
pubmed: 32771089
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1250-1261
pubmed: 32350857
Ann Oper Res. 2022;319(1):1159-1196
pubmed: 32836615
J Infect Dis. 2009 Oct 1;200(7):1018-21
pubmed: 19712039
Optim Lett. 2021;15(4):1385-1396
pubmed: 33042287
Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2020 Apr;136:101922
pubmed: 32288597

Auteurs

Javid Moosavi (J)

School of the Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Seyedmohsen Hosseini (S)

Industrial Engineering Technology, University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, MS, USA.

Classifications MeSH