Classification of Complex Emotions Using EEG and Virtual Environment: Proof of Concept and Therapeutic Implication.
classification
electroencephalography
emotions
machine-learning
multimodal virtual scenario
neuro-feedback
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
18
05
2021
accepted:
29
07
2021
entrez:
13
9
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the last decades, neurofeedback training for emotional self-regulation has received significant attention from scientific and clinical communities. Most studies have investigated emotions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), including the real-time application in neurofeedback training. However, the electroencephalogram (EEG) is a more suitable tool for therapeutic application. Our study aims at establishing a method to classify discrete complex emotions (e.g., tenderness and anguish) elicited through a near-immersive scenario that can be later used for EEG-neurofeedback. EEG-based affective computing studies have mainly focused on emotion classification based on dimensions, commonly using passive elicitation through single-modality stimuli. Here, we integrated both passive and active elicitation methods. We recorded electrophysiological data during emotion-evoking trials, combining emotional self-induction with a multimodal virtual environment. We extracted correlational and time-frequency features, including frontal-alpha asymmetry (FAA), using Complex Morlet Wavelet convolution. Thinking about future real-time applications, we performed within-subject classification using 1-s windows as samples and we applied trial-specific cross-validation. We opted for a traditional machine-learning classifier with low computational complexity and sufficient validation in online settings, the Support Vector Machine. Results of individual-based cross-validation using the whole feature sets showed considerable between-subject variability. The individual accuracies ranged from 59.2 to 92.9% using time-frequency/FAA and 62.4 to 92.4% using correlational features. We found that features of the temporal, occipital, and left-frontal channels were the most discriminative between the two emotions. Our results show that the suggested pipeline is suitable for individual-based classification of discrete emotions, paving the way for future personalized EEG-neurofeedback training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34512297
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.711279
pmc: PMC8427812
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
711279Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 De Filippi, Wolter, Melo, Tierra-Criollo, Bortolini, Deco and Moll.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neural Eng. 2018 Jun;15(3):031005
pubmed: 29488902
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 24;9:390
pubmed: 30087646
IEEE Access. 2018;6:10840-10849
pubmed: 30271700
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):799-809
pubmed: 16276356
Brain Topogr. 2008 Jun;20(4):224-31
pubmed: 18340523
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Apr;60(1):34-43
pubmed: 15993964
PLoS One. 2008 Mar 26;3(3):e1897
pubmed: 18365029
Eur Neurol. 1998;39(4):193-9
pubmed: 9635468
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jul;106:13-22
pubmed: 27155161
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Jun 24;573:52-7
pubmed: 24820541
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 08;10(7):e0130129
pubmed: 26154513
Neuroreport. 2004 Sep 15;15(13):2033-7
pubmed: 15486477
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Mar;15(3):170-80
pubmed: 24552785
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002 Apr;5(2):129-37
pubmed: 12025879
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1735-42
pubmed: 20728544
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2006 Feb;36(2):119-30
pubmed: 16380825
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:81-86
pubmed: 31145982
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:373-403
pubmed: 17002554
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 5;32(36):12499-505
pubmed: 22956840
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Jan;66(1):75-81
pubmed: 2431869
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 31;19(21):
pubmed: 31683608
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 24;5(7):eaaw4358
pubmed: 31355334
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014 Mar;113(3):882-93
pubmed: 24440136
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Nov;37(6):1281-94
pubmed: 20484523
Brain. 2019 Sep 1;142(9):2873-2887
pubmed: 31321407
J Neural Eng. 2017 Aug;14(4):046024
pubmed: 28393761
Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 23;14:622759
pubmed: 33424547
J Clin Psychol. 2013 Jan;69(1):28-44
pubmed: 23070875
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Aug 18;2013:618649
pubmed: 24023532
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:1201-1204
pubmed: 31946108
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7
pubmed: 2464490
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Oct;66(10):2869-2881
pubmed: 30735981
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:280-93
pubmed: 25999121
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Dec;22(12):2769-83
pubmed: 22178712
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Nov 27;19(6):1236-1246
pubmed: 28481991
J Neural Eng. 2018 Feb;15(1):016009
pubmed: 28914232
Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73
pubmed: 8497555
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 06;10:451
pubmed: 30894829
Memory. 2009 Nov;17(8):802-8
pubmed: 19691001
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72
pubmed: 12529060
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Dec;7(6):734-41
pubmed: 15687809
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Nov;74(2):158-65
pubmed: 19709636
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1987 Apr;34(4):283-8
pubmed: 3504202
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
pubmed: 7777651
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 3;115(27):E6106-E6115
pubmed: 29915059
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 01;12:225
pubmed: 30443208
Sci Rep. 2018 May 23;8(1):8029
pubmed: 29795119
J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1105-32
pubmed: 15509278
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:161-80
pubmed: 18400930
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Feb;19(2):276-83
pubmed: 18502730