A Roadmap for Successful State Sepsis Regulations-Lessons From New York.
hospitals
policy making
quality improvement
regulations
sepsis
state policy
Journal
Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez:
13
9
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
New York state implemented the first state-level sepsis regulations in 2013. These regulations were associated with improved mortality, leading other states to consider similar steps. Our objective was to provide insight into New York state's sepsis policy making process, creating a roadmap for policymakers in other states considering similar regulations. Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. We recruited key stakeholders who had knowledge of the New York state sepsis regulations. Thirteen key stakeholders from three groups included four New York state policymakers and seven clinicians and hospital association leaders involved in the creation and implementation of the 2013 New York state sepsis regulations, as well as two members of patient advocacy groups engaged in sepsis advocacy. None. We used iterative, inductive thematic analysis to identify themes related to participant perceptions of the New York state sepsis policy, factors that influenced the policy's perceived successes, and opportunities for improvement. We identified several factors that facilitated success. Among these were that policymakers engaged a diverse array of stakeholders in development, allowing them to address potential barriers to implementation and create early buy-in. Policymakers also paid specific attention to the balance between the desire for comprehensive reporting and the burden of data collection, narrowly focusing on "essential" sepsis-related data elements to reduce the burden on hospitals. In addition, the regulations touched on all three major domains of sepsis quality-structure, process, and outcomes-going beyond a data collection to give hospitals tools to improve sepsis care. We identified factors that distinguish the New York sepsis regulations from less successful sepsis polices at the federal level. Ultimately, lessons from New York state provide valuable guidance to policymakers and hospital officials seeking to develop and implement policies that will improve sepsis quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34514423
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000521
pmc: PMC8423398
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0521Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS025146
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007820
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):590-4
pubmed: 27044956
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74
pubmed: 23442987
Fed Regist. 2015 Aug 17;80(158):49325-886
pubmed: 26292371
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(Suppl 1):10-67
pubmed: 32030529
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032
pubmed: 30585827
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):963-968
pubmed: 29236094
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):367-74
pubmed: 20035219
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12
pubmed: 25275252
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377
pubmed: 28101605
Pediatrics. 2020 Jul;146(1):
pubmed: 32605994
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1889-1897
pubmed: 30048332
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1673-6
pubmed: 24738642
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):968-970
pubmed: 29466551
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):486-96
pubmed: 17259444
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):585-92
pubmed: 22392670
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec;54:88-93
pubmed: 31400737
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 11;367(15):1428-37
pubmed: 23050526
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2311-2313
pubmed: 28528558
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112516
pubmed: 31437661
JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):240-250
pubmed: 31310298
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1620-8
pubmed: 26109396
Cancer. 2020 Oct 15;126(20):4584-4592
pubmed: 32780469
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 05;7:CD011156
pubmed: 31276606
JAMA. 2014 Oct 8;312(14):1397-8
pubmed: 25291572
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1411-1418
pubmed: 32931187
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209700
pubmed: 32639568
Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1271-1275
pubmed: 29697433
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):514-26
pubmed: 22392662
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1119-1126
pubmed: 31260359
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206
pubmed: 5338568