Lateral osteoarthritis progression is associated with a postoperative residual tibiofemoral subluxation in Oxford UKA.
Lateral
Limb alignment
Osteoarthritis
Oxford knee
Tibiofemoral subluxation
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
16
04
2021
accepted:
27
08
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
31
8
2022
entrez:
13
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lateral compartment osteoarthritis progression (LOP) is a major complication after Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA). This study aimed to identify the association between tibiofemoral subluxation (TFS) and LOP after OUKA. Patients whose TFS was uncorrectable according to preoperative stress radiographs were hypothesised to develop residual TFS even after surgery, and thought to be more likely to develop LOP. The study included 201 patients who underwent medial OUKA. Fifteen patients showed increases in LOP of at least two Kellgren-Lawrence grades after surgery [progression (P) group], while the others had no progression (N group, n = 186). TFS was measured on preoperative full leg weight-bearing radiographs, valgus stress radiographs and postoperative plain radiographs. Valgus stress radiographs were obtained using a firm manual valgus force with the knee flexed at 20°. Leg alignment, Oxford knee score (OKS), and revision rates were assessed. The P group had significantly higher TFS values on preoperative valgus stress (6.8° ± 2.2° vs. 4.5° ± 2.0°; P < 0.001) and postoperative radiographs (6.6° ± 2.3° vs. 4.6° ± 2.9°; P < 0.001) than the N group. Patients with postoperative residual TFS and postoperative valgus alignment were more likely to have LOP, but 9 of the 15 LOP patients did not show postoperative valgus alignment. The P group had significantly poorer postoperative OKS (33.0 ± 10.2 vs. 37.4 ± 6.5, P = 0.017) and a higher rate of revision (6/15 vs 6/186; odds ratio = 19.16; 95% CI = 4.98-76.05, P < 0.001). OA progression in the lateral compartment after medial OUKA might be associated with postoperative residual TFS, but does not always coexist with postoperative valgus alignment. Preoperative assessment of TFS with valgus stress could be a potential predictor of postoperative residual TFS and LOP. Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34514512
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06729-y
pii: 10.1007/s00167-021-06729-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3236-3243Informations de copyright
© 2021. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Références
Abu Al-Rub Z, Lamb JN, West RM, Yang X, Hu Y, Pandit HG (2020) Survivorship of fixed vs mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sixty-four studies and National Joint Registries. Knee 27:1635–1644
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.004
Bergeson AG, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Hurst JM, Morris MJ, Sneller MA (2013) Medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early survivorship and analysis of failures in 1000 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 28:172–175
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.005
Cao Z, Niu C, Gong C, Sun Y, Xie J, Song Y (2019) Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 34:3114-3123 e3113
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.005
Durlak JA (2009) How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. J Pediatr Psychol 34:917–928
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160
doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW (1986) Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:608–609
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B4.3733839
Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, O’Connor JJ (1987) Unicompartmental Oxford Meniscal knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:1–9
doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(87)80025-6
Hernigou P, Pascale W, Pascale V, Homma Y, Poignard A (2012) Does primary or secondary chondrocalcinosis influence long-term survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1973–1979
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2211-5
Hiranaka T, Tanaka T, Fujishiro T, Anjiki K, Nagata N, Kitazawa D et al (2019) A modified under-vastus approach for knee arthroplasty with anatomical repair of soft tissue. Clin Orthop Surg 11:490–494
doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.490
Kamenaga T, Hiranaka T, Kikuchi K, Hida Y, Fujishiro T, Okamoto K (2018) Influence of tibial component rotation on short-term clinical outcomes in Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 25:1222–1230
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.06.016
Kamenaga T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T (2020) Central implantation of the femoral component relative to the tibial insert improves clinical outcomes in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:3108–3116
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.071
Kendrick BJ, Rout R, Bottomley NJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Price AJ et al (2010) The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:374–379
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23561
Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 221:278–285
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198708000-00037
Kim KT, Lee S, Lee JI, Kim JW (2016) Analysis and treatment of complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 28:46–54
doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2016.28.1.46
Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:145–150
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198971010-00023
Langdown AJ, Pandit H, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW, Svard UC et al (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty for focal spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Acta Orthop 76:688–692
doi: 10.1080/17453670510041772
Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lidgren L (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69:469–474
doi: 10.3109/17453679808997780
Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW (2014) Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 384:1437–1445
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0
Liddle AD, Pandit H, O’Brien S, Doran E, Penny ID, Hooper GJ et al (2013) Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees. Bone Joint J 95-B:181–187
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411
Ma J, Yan Y, Wang W, Wang B, Yue D, Guo W (2021) Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802
pubmed: 34217864
Misir A, Uzun E, Kizkapan TB, Gunay AE, Ozcamdalli M, Husrevoglu K (2020) Lateral and patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis progression after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a five- to 10-year follow-up study. Knee 27:1135–1142
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.05.021
Mohammad HR, Bullock GS, Kennedy JA, Mellon SJ, Murray D, Judge A (2020) Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06091-5
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06091-5
pubmed: 32940731
pmcid: 8458199
Mohammad HR, Mellon S, Judge A, Dodd C, Murray D (2021) The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of cementless medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06549-0
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06549-0
pubmed: 33864470
pmcid: 8901511
Moore DM, Sheridan GA, Welch-Phillips A, O’Byrne JM, Kenny P (2021) Good mid- to long-term results of the cemented oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a non-designer centre. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06665-x
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06665-x
pubmed: 34251470
Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.0800983
Nam D, Khamaisy S, Gladnick BP, Paul S, Pearle AD (2013) Is tibiofemoral subluxation correctable in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 28:1575–1579
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.001
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:54–60
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17114
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:198–204
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767
Pandit H, Spiegelberg B, Clave A, McGrath C, Liddle AD, Murray DW (2016) Aetiology of lateral progression of arthritis following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case-control study. Musculoskelet Surg 100:97–102
doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0394-8
Peersman G, Stuyts B, Vandenlangenbergh T, Cartier P, Fennema P (2015) Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3296–3305
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3131-1
Perka N, Kopf S, Hommel H (2019) A whole leg radiograph is not necessary for postoperative determination of the mechanical leg axis after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:1455–1460
doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03256-x
Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174–179
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2
Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15:17–22
pubmed: 11829329
Sierra RJ, Kassel CA, Wetters NG, Berend KR, Della Valle CJ, Lombardi AV (2013) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! J Arthroplasty 28:128–132
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.040
Vasso M, Corona K, D’Apolito R, Mazzitelli G, Panni AS (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: modes of failure and conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Joints 5:44–50
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601414
Wang D, Willinger L, Athwal KK, Williams A, Amis AA (2021) Knee joint line obliquity causes tibiofemoral subluxation that alters contact areas and meniscal loading. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354652110204783635465211020478
doi: 10.1177/036354652110204783635465211020478
pubmed: 34850639
pmcid: 8283183
White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:582–586
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071640
Zhang W, Wang J, Li H, Wang W, George DM, Huang T (2020) Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 10:19075
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76124-z