Phase II, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Determine the Cantharidin Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects with External Genital Warts.
Journal
American journal of clinical dermatology
ISSN: 1179-1888
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Dermatol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 100895290
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
accepted:
26
08
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
13
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
External genital warts are caused by various subtypes of the human papilloma virus and spread through direct skin-to-skin contact. Approximately 1% of the US population have external genital warts. Although cantharidin has been used to treat external genital warts for decades, there are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved cantharidin products and no reliable or controlled sources of cantharidin available. VP-102 is a drug-device combination product containing cantharidin (0.7% w/v) in a single-use shelf-stable applicator. The objective of this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, phase II clinical trial was to determine the optimal regimen for the treatment, safety, and efficacy of VP-102 in external genital warts. The study was conducted in two parts. Part A was dose finding and Part B was performed following the completion of Part A for a safety and efficacy evaluation. Following completion of Part A, 6-h and 24-h VP-102 regimens under occlusion were selected to be evaluated in Part B. Pooled results from Part B and Part A of the 6-h and 24-h VP-102 treatment regimens showed that 36.7% and 33.3% of participants achieved complete clearance of all treatable external genital warts at the end of treatment vs 4.2% (p < 0.0048) and 0% (p < 0.0075) with the vehicle. Adverse events experienced by the VP-102-treated participants were consistent with the pharmacodynamic action of cantharidin as a vesicant and were primarily mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events included application-site vesicles, pain, and erythema. No participants discontinued the study because of adverse events and no serious adverse events were deemed treatment related. The adverse event profile and efficacy of VP-102 under occlusion demonstrated in this study support the conclusion that a 6-h or up to 24-h exposure regimen represents an acceptable risk:benefit profile and justifies the conduct of a larger vehicle-controlled phase III study in external genital warts. NCT03981822, actual study start date: 25 June, 2019; actual primary completion date: 21 May, 2020; actual study completion date: 8 July, 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
External genital warts are caused by various subtypes of the human papilloma virus and spread through direct skin-to-skin contact. Approximately 1% of the US population have external genital warts. Although cantharidin has been used to treat external genital warts for decades, there are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved cantharidin products and no reliable or controlled sources of cantharidin available. VP-102 is a drug-device combination product containing cantharidin (0.7% w/v) in a single-use shelf-stable applicator.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, phase II clinical trial was to determine the optimal regimen for the treatment, safety, and efficacy of VP-102 in external genital warts.
METHODS
METHODS
The study was conducted in two parts. Part A was dose finding and Part B was performed following the completion of Part A for a safety and efficacy evaluation. Following completion of Part A, 6-h and 24-h VP-102 regimens under occlusion were selected to be evaluated in Part B.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Pooled results from Part B and Part A of the 6-h and 24-h VP-102 treatment regimens showed that 36.7% and 33.3% of participants achieved complete clearance of all treatable external genital warts at the end of treatment vs 4.2% (p < 0.0048) and 0% (p < 0.0075) with the vehicle. Adverse events experienced by the VP-102-treated participants were consistent with the pharmacodynamic action of cantharidin as a vesicant and were primarily mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events included application-site vesicles, pain, and erythema. No participants discontinued the study because of adverse events and no serious adverse events were deemed treatment related.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The adverse event profile and efficacy of VP-102 under occlusion demonstrated in this study support the conclusion that a 6-h or up to 24-h exposure regimen represents an acceptable risk:benefit profile and justifies the conduct of a larger vehicle-controlled phase III study in external genital warts.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT03981822, actual study start date: 25 June, 2019; actual primary completion date: 21 May, 2020; actual study completion date: 8 July, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34515985
doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00635-2
pii: 10.1007/s40257-021-00635-2
pmc: PMC8436872
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cantharidin
IGL471WQ8P
VP-102
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03981822']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
867-875Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Feb;12(2):27-30
pubmed: 30881580
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1035-8
pubmed: 19470067
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Aug;34(8):1644-1653
pubmed: 32735077
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jan 25;13:39
pubmed: 23347441
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2012 Jun;5(6):25-36
pubmed: 22768354
Calif Med. 1960 Jul;93:11-2
pubmed: 13820498
Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20151968
pubmed: 26908697
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1315-1323
pubmed: 32965495
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Mar;22(2):257-265
pubmed: 33599960
Dermatol Online J. 2013 Jun 15;19(6):18559
pubmed: 24011309
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000 May-Jun;1(3):143-9
pubmed: 11702295
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Dec;39(6):951-5
pubmed: 9843007
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Oct;27(4):796-806
pubmed: 9798036
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2018;45(3):383-386
pubmed: 30078935