Modified Intraoral C-Osteotomy.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez:
13
9
2021
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
16
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Repeated sagittal split osteotomy might impose an increased risk for damage of the inferior alveolar nerve. Another contemporary orthognathic issue is surgical management of malocclusion following condylar resorption. Here we describe a modified C-osteotomy technique as a proposed solution for these difficulties in orthognathic surgery. The modified C-osteotomy might induce less stress on the condyles reducing the risk for relapse subsequent to condylar resorption, as well as reduce the risk of inferior alveolar nerve damage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34516059
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007511
pii: 00001665-202109000-00059
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2202-2204Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Iscan D, Motro M, Acar A. Postoperative positional and dimensional changes of mandibular canal after bilateral sagittal split set-back osteotomy. Turk J Orthod 2017; 30:110.
Yamamoto R, Nakamura A, Ohno K, et al. Relationship of the mandibular canal to the lateral cortex of the mandibular ramus as a factor in the development of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60:490.
Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Kaneuji T, et al. Risk factors for neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy based on position of mandibular canal and morphology of mandibular angle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70:401.
Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Beinemann J, et al. Evaluation of risk of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve with classical sagittal split osteotomy technique and proposed alternative surgical techniques using computer-assisted surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41:79.
Crawford JG, Stoelinga PJW, Blijdorp PA, et al. Stability after reoperation for progressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: report of seven cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 52:460.
Chigurupati R, Mehra P. Surgical management of idiopathic condylar resorption. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018; 30:355.
Verhelst P-J, Cruyssen F, Van der, et al. The biomechanical effect of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the temporomandibular joint: current perspectives on the remodeling spectrum. Front Physiol 2019; 10:1021.
Caldwell JB, Hayward JR, Lister RL. Correction of mandibular retrognathia by vertical L osteotomy: a new technic. J Oral Surg 1968; 26:259.
Politis C, Piagkou M, Lambrichts I, et al. Wide intraoral surgical access to the inferior alveolar nerve during cryotherapy at the infratemporal fossa: technical modification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76:2090 e1.
Agbaje JO, Gemels B, Salem AS, et al. Modified mandibular inferior border sagittal split osteotomy reduces postoperative risk for developing inferior border defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:1062 e1.
Kobayashi A, Yoshimasu H, Kobayashi J, et al. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted l ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64:778.
Ellis E. A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65:2125.
Kang MG, Yun KI, Kim CH, et al. Postoperative condylar position by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without bone graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:2058.
Arnett GW, Gunson MJ. Risk factors in the initiation of condylar resorption. Semin Orthod 2013; 19:81.
Arnett GW. A redefinition of bilateral sagittal osteotomy (BSO) advancement relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104:506.
Yang HJ, Lee WJ, Yi WJ, et al. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2010; 110:18.
Yang HJ, Hwang SJ. Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42:325.