Thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusion with a new generation of Stentretriever (Tigertriever 13).
Endovascular recanalization
distal
mild symptoms
stroke
thrombectomy
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
14
9
2021
medline:
28
7
2022
entrez:
13
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Tigertriever 13 (Rapid Medical, Yoqneam, Israel) stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with primary or secondary distal, medium vessel occlusions (DMVO). We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive AIS patients who underwent thrombectomy with the Tigertriever13 for DMVO. Patients' characteristics were reviewed, procedural complications, angiographic (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score [mTICI]) and clinical (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) outcomes were documented. Between November 2019 and November 2020, 16 patients with 17 DMVO were included (40% female, median age 60 [50-65] years). The Tigertriever13 was used in 11/17 (65%, median NIHSS of 8 [6-15]) primary DMVO and in 6/17 (35%, median NIHSS of 20 [13-24]) cases of secondary DMVO after a proximal thrombectomy. The successful reperfusion rate (mTICI 2b, 2c, 3) was 94% (16/17) for the dedicated vessel. At day 1, CT imaging showed a subarachnoid hemorrhage in 29% of the cases and a parenchymal hematoma in 12%. At 3 months, 65% of the patients (11/17) had a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2). Mechanical thrombectomy using the Tigertriever13 appears to be safe and effective for DMVO. Clinical and anatomical results are in line with those of patients with proximal occlusions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34516332
doi: 10.1177/15910199211039926
pmc: PMC9326865
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
444-454Références
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):51-58
pubmed: 30413830
BMC Neurol. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):197
pubmed: 31419959
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2872-2884
pubmed: 32757757
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2036-2044
pubmed: 32517584
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Nov 01;73(11):1291-1296
pubmed: 27617425
Clin Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;27(3):351-360
pubmed: 26795038
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):905-909
pubmed: 29650784
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 May;36(5):971-6
pubmed: 25634721
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):794-797
pubmed: 32024783
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Dec;13(12):1067-1072
pubmed: 33468609
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Nov;9(11):1039-1097
pubmed: 27742747
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Sep;9(9):866-74
pubmed: 20667790
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Jul;5(4):371-5
pubmed: 22490430
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:684-691
pubmed: 28844911
J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;45(5):305-309
pubmed: 29410105
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jun;9(6):541-546
pubmed: 27286991
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Oct;9(10):922-928
pubmed: 27688267
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2650-63
pubmed: 23920012
JAMA. 2019 Oct 01;322(13):1283-1293
pubmed: 31573636
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;31(2):491-497
pubmed: 32529306