Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography for Hemodynamic Assessment in Critically Ill Children.


Journal

Pediatric cardiology
ISSN: 1432-1971
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003849

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 24 06 2021
accepted: 06 09 2021
pubmed: 15 9 2021
medline: 19 2 2022
entrez: 14 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

An accurate assessment of cardiovascular performance is essential to predict and evaluate hemodynamic response to interventions. The objective of this prospective study was to assess whether point-of-care ultrasonography of the common carotid artery (CCA) can estimate the stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (Ci) of critically ill children. Participants underwent Doppler ultrasonography of the left CCA and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Variables measured by TTE were SV and Ci. Carotid blood flow (CBF) was calculated based on both systolic velocity-time integral (CBF

Identifiants

pubmed: 34518914
doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02732-9
pii: 10.1007/s00246-021-02732-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

382-390

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Alobaidi R, Morgan C, Basu RK et al (2018) Association between fluid balance and outcomes in critically ill children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 172:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4540
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4540 pubmed: 29356810 pmcid: 5885847
Razavi A, Newth CJL, Khemani RG et al (2017) Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance: clinical assessment compared with a noninvasive objective measurement in children with shock. J Crit Care 39:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.018
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.018 pubmed: 28088009
Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR et al (2013) Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 117:1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a9557e
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a9557e pubmed: 24257389
Ramsingh D, Alexander B, Cannesson M (2013) Clinical review: does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used? Crit Care 17:208. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11814
doi: 10.1186/cc11814 pubmed: 23672729 pmcid: 3745643
van Wijk JJ, Weber F, Stolker RJ et al (2020) Current state of noninvasive, continuous monitoring modalities in pediatric anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 33:781
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000927
Suehiro K, Joosten A, Murphy LS-L et al (2016) Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 30:603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9757-9
doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9757-9 pubmed: 26315477
De Souza TH, Brandão MB, Nadal JAH et al (2018) Ultrasound guidance for pediatric central venous catheterization: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 142:e20181719. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1719
doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1719 pubmed: 30361397
Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204
doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204 pubmed: 10501650
Chew MS, Poelaert J (2003) Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature. Intensive Care Med 29:1889–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1967-9
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1967-9 pubmed: 12955181
Bonett DG, Wright TA (2000) Sample size requirements for estimating pearson, kendall and spearman correlations. Psychometrika 65:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294183
doi: 10.1007/BF02294183
Gaspar HA, Morhy SS, Lianza AC et al (2014) Focused cardiac ultrasound: a training course for pediatric intensivists and emergency physicians. BMC Med Educ 14:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-25
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-25 pubmed: 24502581 pmcid: 3926333
Peng Q-Y, Zhang L-N, Ai M-L et al (2017) Common carotid artery sonography versus transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac output measurements in intensive care unit patients. J Ultrasound Med 36:1793–1799. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14214
doi: 10.1002/jum.14214 pubmed: 28429475
Sidor M, Premachandra L, Hanna B et al (2018) Carotid flow as a surrogate for cardiac output measurement in hemodynamically stable participants. J Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618775694
doi: 10.1177/0885066618775694 pubmed: 29742951
Roehrig C, Govier M, Robinson J et al (2017) Carotid Doppler flowmetry correlates poorly with thermodilution cardiac output following cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12822
doi: 10.1111/aas.12822 pubmed: 27766613
Gassner M, Killu K, Bauman Z et al (2015) Feasibility of common carotid artery point of care ultrasound in cardiac output measurements compared to invasive methods. J Ultrasound 18:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0139-9
doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0139-9 pubmed: 26191100
Ma IWY, Caplin JD, Azad A et al (2017) Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements. Crit Ultrasound J 9:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0065-0
doi: 10.1186/s13089-017-0065-0 pubmed: 28429291 pmcid: 5398973
Nusmeier A, van der Hoeven JG, Lemson J (2010) Cardiac output monitoring in pediatric patients. Expert Rev Med Devices 7:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.10.19
doi: 10.1586/erd.10.19 pubmed: 20583887
Beier L, Davis J, Esener D et al (2020) Carotid ultrasound to predict fluid responsiveness. J Ultrasound Med 39:1965–1976. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15301
doi: 10.1002/jum.15301 pubmed: 32314817
Kim D-H, Shin S, Kim N et al (2018) Carotid ultrasound measurements for assessing fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity. Br J Anaesth 121:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.047
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.047 pubmed: 30115251
Barjaktarevic I, Toppen WE, Hu S et al (2018) Ultrasound assessment of the change in carotid corrected flow time in fluid responsiveness in undifferentiated shock. Crit Care Med 46:e1040
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003356

Auteurs

Aline Junqueira Rubio (AJ)

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 126, Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street., Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil.

Luiza Lobo de Souza (LL)

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 126, Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street., Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil.

Roberto J N Nogueira (RJN)

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 126, Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street., Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Marcelo B Brandão (MB)

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 126, Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street., Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil.

Tiago H de Souza (TH)

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 126, Tessália Vieira de Camargo Street., Campinas, SP, 13083-887, Brazil. tiago.souza@hc.unicamp.br.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH