Dynamic selection for forage quality and quantity in response to phenology and insects in an Arctic ungulate.
Alaska
Rangifer tarandus
biomass
caribou
digestible energy
digestible nitrogen
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
21
08
2020
revised:
03
06
2021
accepted:
07
06
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
16
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spatiotemporal variation in forage is a primary driver of ungulate behavior, yet little is known about the nutritional components they select, and how selection varies across the growing season with changes in forage quality and quantity. We addressed these uncertainties in barren-ground caribou (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34522332
doi: 10.1002/ece3.7852
pii: ECE37852
pmc: PMC8427565
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11664-11688Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 22;256(1345):77-82
pubmed: 8008761
Oecologia. 2000 Apr;123(1):108-115
pubmed: 28308735
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171807
pubmed: 28231256
Biom J. 2008 Feb;50(1):97-109
pubmed: 17849385
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 22;282(1815):
pubmed: 26378217
Oecologia. 2015 Oct;179(2):377-91
pubmed: 26009244
Oecologia. 1998 Jun;115(1-2):84-92
pubmed: 28308471
Mov Ecol. 2014 Feb 07;2(1):4
pubmed: 25520815
Ecology. 2013 Aug;94(8):1815-27
pubmed: 24015525
Biometrics. 2001 Mar;57(1):120-5
pubmed: 11252586
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0169779
pubmed: 28081571
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 25;9(1):15333
pubmed: 31654045
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 05;11(4):e0150333
pubmed: 27045587
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2006 May-Jun;79(3):628-44
pubmed: 16691528
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1221-31
pubmed: 12396514
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3872-82
pubmed: 24957266
Ecol Appl. 2012 Sep;22(6):1838-51
pubmed: 23092020
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48697
pubmed: 23144932
Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1400-11
pubmed: 19537559
Mov Ecol. 2019 Jun 6;7:18
pubmed: 31183112
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 29;283(1833):
pubmed: 27335416
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):284-95
pubmed: 21950373
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127586
pubmed: 26061003
Ecology. 2021 Mar;102(3):e03268
pubmed: 33326603
Oecologia. 2013 Oct;173(2):409-20
pubmed: 23552985
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(19):4546-4563
pubmed: 33993595
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3554-65
pubmed: 20120822
J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):910-22
pubmed: 20443990
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 26;3(4):e1601365
pubmed: 28508037
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
pubmed: 12511946
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):32-42
pubmed: 25950737
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2008 Nov-Dec;81(6):835-55
pubmed: 18702605
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jun;20(6):741-750
pubmed: 28444870
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 23;6(16):5843-53
pubmed: 27547359
Ecol Evol. 2020 Nov 18;10(24):13847-13859
pubmed: 33391685
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):187-98
pubmed: 20609113
Ecol Appl. 2017 Oct;27(7):2061-2073
pubmed: 28653471
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2156-2174
pubmed: 27755722