Pungent and volatile constituents of dried Australian ginger.
GC-MS
HPLC
Organoleptic properties
Volatile constituents
Zingiber officinale
Journal
Current research in food science
ISSN: 2665-9271
Titre abrégé: Curr Res Food Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771059
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
12
05
2021
revised:
22
08
2021
accepted:
29
08
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
16
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ginger is well known for its pungent flavour and health-benefitting properties, both of which are imparted by various gingerol derivatives and other volatile constituents. Although there has been a considerable amount of research into the chemical constituents found in fresh ginger, there is little information available on the quality of Australian-grown dried ginger, particularly that intended for processing purposes. Here, we investigate differences in the chemical composition of three samples of processing-grade ginger, ranging from very poor to good quality. Gingerols and 6-shogaol were quantified using high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC), while gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify and semi-quantify the volatile constituents and other gingerol derivatives. Significant differences were found between the samples in their content of gingerols and [6]-shogaol, as well as in their total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity. A total of 100 volatile compounds were identified in the dried ginger samples, including 54 terpenoid derivatives and 35 gingerol derivatives. Several compounds are reported from ginger for the first time, including limonene glycol and neryl laurate. In addition, we provide the second report of the presence of shyobunol, geranyl-
Identifiants
pubmed: 34522899
doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.08.010
pii: S2665-9271(21)00063-0
pmc: PMC8427268
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
612-618Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Food Chem. 2013 Aug 15;139(1-4):509-14
pubmed: 23561138
J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Nov 14;102(2):177-84
pubmed: 16024193
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2020 Jun 5;233:118228
pubmed: 32155578
Phytochemistry. 2006 Aug;67(15):1673-85
pubmed: 16169024
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Jul 23;56(14):5564-71
pubmed: 18564850
J Chromatogr. 1963 Aug;11:463-71
pubmed: 14062605
Drug Metab Dispos. 2012 Apr;40(4):742-53
pubmed: 22246389
Auton Neurosci. 2011 Apr 26;161(1-2):63-7
pubmed: 21185236
Food Chem. 2014 Sep 1;158:101-11
pubmed: 24731320
Phytochemistry. 2004 Jul;65(13):1937-54
pubmed: 15280001
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Feb 22;54(4):1414-9
pubmed: 16478268
Cancer Lett. 1998 Dec 25;134(2):163-8
pubmed: 10025876
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 17;18(1):
pubmed: 28106738
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52(8):651-88
pubmed: 22591340
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Oct 29;62(43):10452-7
pubmed: 25293633
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Oct;46(10):3295-302
pubmed: 18706468
J Med Food. 2005 Summer;8(2):125-32
pubmed: 16117603
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1982;17(3):189-258
pubmed: 6756789
J Ethnopharmacol. 2019 Nov 15;244:112095
pubmed: 31325601
Mutat Res. 2001 Sep 20;496(1-2):199-206
pubmed: 11551496
J Food Sci Technol. 2014 Nov;51(11):3190-8
pubmed: 26396311
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020 Jan;393(1):43-55
pubmed: 31420719
Se Pu. 2008 Nov;26(6):692-6
pubmed: 19253546
J Nat Prod. 2002 Nov;65(11):1633-7
pubmed: 12444689
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2019 Mar 1;27(2):152-159
pubmed: 30001610
Phytochemistry. 2005 Jul;66(13):1614-35
pubmed: 15996695
Molecules. 2018 Jul 05;23(7):
pubmed: 29976903
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 1999;18(2):131-9
pubmed: 15281225
J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Jul 13;53(14):5772-8
pubmed: 15998147