In situ experimental evidences for responses of abyssal benthic biota to shifts in phytodetritus compositions linked to global climate change.
abyssal plain
benthic ecosystems
climate change
ecosystem functioning
isotope tracer
primary producers
Journal
Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
revised:
04
08
2021
received:
04
08
2021
accepted:
30
08
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Abyssal plains cover more than half of Earth's surface, and the main food source in these ecosystems is phytodetritus, mainly originating from primary producers in the euphotic zone of the ocean. Global climate change is influencing phytoplankton abundance, productivity, and distribution. Increasing importance of picoplankton over diatom as primary producers in surface oceans (especially projected for higher latitudes) is projected and hence altering the quantity of organic carbon supplied to the abyssal seafloor as phytodetritus, consequences of which remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the in situ responses of abyssal biota from viruses to megafauna to different types of phytoplankton input (diatoms or cyanobacteria which were labeled with stable isotopes) at equatorial (oligotrophic) and temperate (eutrophic) benthic sites in the Pacific Ocean (1°N at 4277 m water depth and 39°N at 5260 m water depth, respectively). Our results show that meiofauna and macrofauna generally preferred diatoms as a food source and played a relatively larger role in the consumption of phytodetritus at higher latitudes (39°N). Contrarily, prokaryotes and viruses showed similar or even stronger responses to cyanobacterial than to diatom supply. Moreover, the response of prokaryotes and viruses was very rapid (within 1-2 days) at both 1°N and 39°N, with quickest responses reported in the case of cyanobacterial supply at higher latitudes. Overall, our results suggest that benthic deep-sea eukaryotes will be negatively affected by the predicted decrease in diatoms in surface oceans, especially at higher latitudes, where benthic prokaryotes and viruses will otherwise likely increase their quantitative role and organic carbon cycling rates. In turn, such changes can contribute to decrease carbon transfer from phytodetritus to higher trophic levels, with strong potential to affect oceanic food webs, their biodiversity and consequently carbon sequestration capacity at the global scale.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34523189
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15882
pmc: PMC9293103
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6139-6155Subventions
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI
ID : 24540504
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI
ID : JP16K00534
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI
ID : JP19K04048
Organisme : Marie Curie Actions through the project CEFMED
ID : 327488
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Front Microbiol. 2016 Sep 22;7:1501
pubmed: 27713739
Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 5;27(11):R461-R465
pubmed: 28586679
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 09;6:7608
pubmed: 26158221
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22588
pubmed: 21829635
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 May;91(2):275-87
pubmed: 25523624
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17006-11
pubmed: 18974223
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):801-4
pubmed: 11236989
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e95839
pubmed: 24788771
Biol Lett. 2011 Oct 23;7(5):718-22
pubmed: 21429909
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38582
pubmed: 22723867
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Dec 15;364(23):
pubmed: 29045616
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(7):1013-22
pubmed: 19536269
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 23;10:1952
pubmed: 31507564
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1556-60
pubmed: 18227517
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21717-20
pubmed: 20018702
ISME J. 2012 Jun;6(6):1250-9
pubmed: 22170423
Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):513-5
pubmed: 15273392
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12115-20
pubmed: 16880384
Nature. 2003 Aug 14;424(6950):763-6
pubmed: 12917681
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jan;21(1):154-64
pubmed: 25044507
Sci Adv. 2016 Oct 12;2(10):e1600492
pubmed: 27757416
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 02;5(8):e11832
pubmed: 20689848
Nature. 2013 Oct 10;502(7470):183-7
pubmed: 24108050
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Dec;27(23):6139-6155
pubmed: 34523189
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19211-8
pubmed: 19901326
Science. 2007 Apr 27;316(5824):567-70
pubmed: 17463282
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;4(2):181-192
pubmed: 32015428
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 18;109(38):15366-71
pubmed: 22949638
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2012;4:237-62
pubmed: 22457975
Adv Mar Biol. 2009;56:1-150
pubmed: 19895974
Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1084-7
pubmed: 18756250
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 7;282(1810):
pubmed: 26063843
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Sep;23(9):518-28
pubmed: 18584909