Impact of the menstrual cycle on commercial prognostic gene signatures in oestrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer.
Breast cancer
Hormone receptors
Menstrual cycle
Oestrogen-regulated genes
Prognostic signatures
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2021
accepted:
26
08
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Changes occur in the expression of oestrogen-regulated and proliferation-associated genes in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast tumours during the menstrual cycle. We investigated if Oncotype® DX recurrence score (RS), Prosigna® (ROR) and EndoPredict® (EP/EPclin) prognostic tests, which include some of these genes, vary according to the time in the menstrual cycle when they are measured. Pairs of test scores were derived from 30 ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative tumours sampled at two different points of the menstrual cycle. Menstrual cycle windows were prospectively defined as either W1 (days 1-6 and 27-35; low oestrogen and low progesterone) or W2 (days 7-26; high oestrogen and high or low progesterone). The invasion module score of RS was lower (- 10.9%; p = 0.098), whereas the ER (+ 16.6%; p = 0.046) and proliferation (+ 7.3%; p = 0.13) module scores were higher in W2. PGR expression was significantly increased in W2 (+ 81.4%; p = 0.0029). Despite this, mean scores were not significantly different between W1 and W2 for any of the tests and the two measurements showed high correlation (r = 0.72-0.93). However, variability between the two measurements led to tumours being assigned to different risk categories in the following proportion of cases: RS 22.7%, ROR 27.3%, EP 13.6% and EPclin 13.6%. There are significant changes during the menstrual cycle in the expression of some of the genes and gene module scores comprising the RS, ROR and EP/EPclin scores. These did not affect any of the prognostic scores in a systematic fashion, but there was substantial variability in paired measurements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34524591
doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06377-3
pii: 10.1007/s10549-021-06377-3
pmc: PMC8558287
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
295-305Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Pathol Clin Res. 2018 Oct;4(4):262-273
pubmed: 30066480
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2817-26
pubmed: 15591335
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Nov 15;5:42
pubmed: 31754627
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Nov;148(2):327-35
pubmed: 25367875
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Sep;17(3):317-23
pubmed: 9894769
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1160-7
pubmed: 19204204
Clin Chem. 2007 Jun;53(6):1084-91
pubmed: 17463177
Ann Surg Oncol. 1997 Sep;4(6):462-9
pubmed: 9309334
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 10;39(2):126-135
pubmed: 33108242
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(1):90
pubmed: 32811558
Neoplasma. 2002;49(4):278
pubmed: 12382029
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 15;17(18):6012-20
pubmed: 21807638
Future Sci OA. 2017 Jun 05;3(3):FSO221
pubmed: 28884016
Lancet. 1998 Apr 18;351(9110):1170-3
pubmed: 9643688
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb;138(1):157-65
pubmed: 23378065
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
Arch Iran Med. 2006 Jul;9(3):250-3
pubmed: 16859061
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1134-50
pubmed: 26858339
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb 20;39(6):557-564
pubmed: 33306425
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Feb 12;7(1):15
pubmed: 33579961
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Aug 22;8:54
pubmed: 26297356
Cancer. 2001 May 15;91(10):1854-61
pubmed: 11346866
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;26(3):317-25
pubmed: 18278033
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 10;107(9):
pubmed: 26063794
Cancer. 1998 Aug 15;83(4):698-705
pubmed: 9708933
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Nov 27;3:47
pubmed: 29214214
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4365-72
pubmed: 22010013
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):962-4
pubmed: 12796038