Stromal marker fibroblast activation protein drives outcome in T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
/ diagnosis
Disease Progression
Female
Fibroblasts
/ metabolism
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ pathology
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Software
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
27
06
2021
accepted:
25
08
2021
entrez:
15
9
2021
pubmed:
16
9
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) is a transmembrane peptidase and a surrogate marker for cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAP has been linked to worse prognosis and therapy resistance in several cancers. We hypothesised that FAP might have a prognostic 3biomarker potential to stratify patients with high-grade (HG) T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We selected 30 patients with HG T1 NMIBC that progressed to ≥T2 disease which were pair-matched based on CUETO progression score variables with 90 patients that did not progress. After revision a final cohort of 86 patients was retained. Slides were stained for FAP, the luminal marker GATA3 and the basal marker CK5. All HG T1 tumour regions of interest (ROIs) within each patient were annotated, analysed and scored using image analysis software. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs was significantly higher in progressors vs. non-progressors and was prognostic for recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs remained strongly prognostic for these outcomes in a bivariable model corrected for adequate BCG per FDA definition. Expression of GATA3 and CK5 did not differ between progressors vs. non-progressors, and were not prognostic for these outcomes. FAP might serve as an easily applicable prognostic biomarker to risk-stratify patients with HG T1 NMIBC if these results are prospectively validated in a larger series.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34525114
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257195
pii: PONE-D-21-20985
pmc: PMC8443055
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0257195Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The above does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Nature. 2018 Feb 22;554(7693):544-548
pubmed: 29443960
Cancer Microenviron. 2015 Apr;8(1):23-31
pubmed: 25331442
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 14;10(1):281
pubmed: 31937798
Nat Med. 2019 Nov;25(11):1706-1714
pubmed: 31686036
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 15;12(9):
pubmed: 32942573
EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:105-117
pubmed: 27612592
Eur Urol. 2019 Aug;76(2):258-259
pubmed: 30712969
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jul;10(1):34-42
pubmed: 26170973
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):420-433
pubmed: 31563503
Adv Anat Pathol. 2017 Nov;24(6):311-335
pubmed: 28777143
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020 Sep;39(3):783-803
pubmed: 32601975
Hum Pathol. 2019 Sep;91:61-68
pubmed: 31279874
Nat Med. 2012 Jul 06;18(7):1028-40
pubmed: 22772564
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2195-203
pubmed: 19758621
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0116683
pubmed: 25775399