Fixed-dimension renormalization group analysis of conserved surface roughening.


Journal

Physical review. E
ISSN: 2470-0053
Titre abrégé: Phys Rev E
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 12 03 2021
accepted: 01 07 2021
entrez: 16 9 2021
pubmed: 17 9 2021
medline: 17 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Conserved surface roughening represents a special case of interface dynamics where the total height of the interface is conserved. Recently, it was suggested [Caballero et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 020601 (2018)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.121.020601] that the original continuum model known as the Conserved Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (CKPZ) equation is incomplete, as additional nonlinearity is not forbidden by any symmetry in d>1. In this work, we perform detailed field-theoretic renormalization group (RG) analysis of a general stochastic model describing conserved surface roughening. Systematic power counting reveals additional marginal interaction at the upper critical dimension, which appears also in the context of molecular beam epitaxy. Depending on the origin of the surface particle's mobility, the resulting model shows two different scaling regimes. If the particles move mainly due to the gravity, the leading dispersion law is ω∼k^{2}, and the mean-field approximation describing a flat interface is exact in any spatial dimension. On the other hand, if the particles move mainly due to the surface curvature, the interface becomes rough with the mean-field dispersion law ω∼k^{4}, and the corrections to scaling exponents must be taken into account. We show that the latter model consist of two subclasses of models that are decoupled in all orders of perturbation theory. Moreover, our RG analysis of the general model reveals that the universal scaling is described by a rougher interface than the CKPZ universality class. The universal exponents are derived within the one-loop approximation in both fixed d and ɛ-expansion schemes, and their relation is discussed. We point out all important details behind these two schemes, which are often overlooked in the literature, and their misinterpretation might lead to inconsistent results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34525610
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024104
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

024104

Auteurs

Viktor Škultéty (V)

SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom.

Juha Honkonen (J)

Department of Military Technology, National Defence University, Santahaminantie 2, 00860 Helsinki, Finland.

Classifications MeSH