Pathways for collaboratively strengthening water and sanitation systems.

Collaboration Eastern Africa International development Qualitative comparative analysis Service delivery WASH

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 05 07 2021
revised: 18 08 2021
accepted: 19 08 2021
pubmed: 17 9 2021
medline: 16 11 2021
entrez: 16 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Collaborative approaches are seen as a promising way to strengthen Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) service delivery systems when challenges exceed the mandates and capabilities of any single entity. While collaborative approaches are well studied in high-income country contexts, current understanding of their application to international development contexts is limited. This paper uses fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to assess what conditions and pathways drove or impeded progress within eleven collaborative approaches for WASH service delivery in Eastern Africa. Evidence supported three main findings: (1) Government uptake of recommendations is necessary for progress but cannot be guaranteed solely by government participation in the collaboration, (2) different forms of problem identification are possible; problem scopes are often predefined to align with funders and partner government agendas, but flexible scopes that foster collective problem identification can reap benefits, and (3) hub convening power can be critical and convening power can be gained in different ways. Political dynamics, shifting priorities, and turnover undermine collaborative efforts, but collaborative approaches can still make progress in spite of turnover if funds are available for implementation of activities (i.e. in addition to funds for meetings and hub roles) and program implementers either facilitate collective problem identification or establish a hub with convening power. Yet even these tactics are vulnerable to instability, thus in highly unstable contexts, stakeholders and funders should be realistic from the outset about what they may be able to achieve. Building on existing theories of collaborative approaches, this work revealed that there is no single best design for collaborative approaches in WASH, rather, core elements worked together in different ways depending on the context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34525723
pii: S0048-9697(21)04929-9
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149854
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

149854

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Kimberly Pugel (K)

Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309-0428, USA. Electronic address: kimberly.pugel@colorado.edu.

Amy Javernick-Will (A)

Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309-0428, USA. Electronic address: amy.javernick@colorado.edu.

Shawn Peabody (S)

Environmental Incentives, 725 15th Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA. Electronic address: speabody@enviroincentives.com.

Cliff Nyaga (C)

FundiFix Ltd, PO Box 38-90401, Kyuso, Kitui, Kenya. Electronic address: cliff@fundifix.co.ke.

Muhammed Mussa (M)

IRC Ethiopia, Golagul Towers Building, Bole sub city, Woreda 4, House no. 275/276 8th floor 813, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Tetra Tech, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Electronic address: mussa@ircwash.org.

Lemessa Mekonta (L)

IRC Ethiopia, Golagul Towers Building, Bole sub city, Woreda 4, House no. 275/276 8th floor 813, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Electronic address: mekonta@ircwash.org.

Desta Dimtse (D)

Tetra Tech, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Electronic address: dimtsed@gmail.com.

Martin Watsisi (M)

IRC Uganda, P.O. Box 40398, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: watsisi@ircwash.org.

Elizabeth Buhungiro (E)

Whave Solutions, P.O. Box 72305, Clock Tower Post Office, Kampala, Uganda. Electronic address: elizabeth.buhungiro@whave.org.

Tedla Mulatu (T)

Millennium Water Alliance, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Electronic address: tedla.mulatu@mwawater.org.

Jonathan Annis (J)

Tetra Tech, 159 Bank St 3rd Fl, Burlington, VT 05401, USA. Electronic address: Jonathan.annis@tetratech.com.

Elizabeth Jordan (E)

USAID, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA. Electronic address: ejordan@usaid.gov.

Eleanor Sandifer (E)

Environmental Incentives, 725 15th Street NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA. Electronic address: eleanor.sandifer@colorado.edu.

Karl Linden (K)

Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309-0428, USA. Electronic address: karl.linden@colorado.edu.

Articles similaires

Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
1.00
Oryza Agricultural Irrigation Potassium Sodium Soil
Humans Toilet Facilities Ghana Cross-Sectional Studies Ownership

Classifications MeSH