Comparing inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand health service implementation problems: a case study of childhood vaccination barriers.

COM-B Childhood vaccination Implementation TDF

Journal

Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 14 03 2021
accepted: 25 08 2021
entrez: 16 9 2021
pubmed: 17 9 2021
medline: 17 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Effective implementation requires a comprehensive understanding of individual, organisational and system determinants. This study aimed to compare inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand a complex implementation issue. We used childhood vaccination as a case study, an issue with wide-ranging barriers contributing to low-vaccine uptake internationally. The study is based on the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, which was derived from several levels of theory: the 3 components of the COM-B framework (capability, opportunity and motivation) can be mapped to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is based on 84 underlying constructs. We first conducted a review of systematic reviews of parent-level barriers to childhood vaccination. Subsequently we (1) inductively coded these barriers into a data-driven framework, using thematic analysis, and (2) deductively mapped the barriers to COM-B and TDF domains and constructs. These processes were undertaken by two authors independently, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Inductive and deductive results were compared. The inductive process coded 583 descriptions of barriers identified from the literature into a framework of 74 barriers in 7 categories. The initial definitions used to map the barriers to deductive domains/constructs led to 89% agreement at the domain level. Resolving discrepancies required further definitions at the construct level. Of the 14 TDF domains, 10 were clearly identified in the data from the barrier reviews. Some domains were not specific enough to differentiate between types of barriers (e.g. Environmental Context and Resources), while other domains were not represented in the review data (e.g. Behavioural Regulation). Using both inductive and deductive analysis techniques can help achieve a more comprehensive understanding of barriers to health service implementation. The inductive categories represented the review data in a clearer way than the theoretical domains, with better differentiation; but the missing deductive domains were useful as a way to identify additional issues to investigate further. Both analysis techniques resulted in a comprehensive list of barriers to vaccination that would not have been achieved using either approach alone. We recommend a hybrid approach combining TDF with broader frameworks, for future researchers conducting evidence syntheses.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Effective implementation requires a comprehensive understanding of individual, organisational and system determinants. This study aimed to compare inductive and deductive analysis techniques to understand a complex implementation issue. We used childhood vaccination as a case study, an issue with wide-ranging barriers contributing to low-vaccine uptake internationally.
METHODS METHODS
The study is based on the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, which was derived from several levels of theory: the 3 components of the COM-B framework (capability, opportunity and motivation) can be mapped to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is based on 84 underlying constructs. We first conducted a review of systematic reviews of parent-level barriers to childhood vaccination. Subsequently we (1) inductively coded these barriers into a data-driven framework, using thematic analysis, and (2) deductively mapped the barriers to COM-B and TDF domains and constructs. These processes were undertaken by two authors independently, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Inductive and deductive results were compared.
RESULTS RESULTS
The inductive process coded 583 descriptions of barriers identified from the literature into a framework of 74 barriers in 7 categories. The initial definitions used to map the barriers to deductive domains/constructs led to 89% agreement at the domain level. Resolving discrepancies required further definitions at the construct level. Of the 14 TDF domains, 10 were clearly identified in the data from the barrier reviews. Some domains were not specific enough to differentiate between types of barriers (e.g. Environmental Context and Resources), while other domains were not represented in the review data (e.g. Behavioural Regulation).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Using both inductive and deductive analysis techniques can help achieve a more comprehensive understanding of barriers to health service implementation. The inductive categories represented the review data in a clearer way than the theoretical domains, with better differentiation; but the missing deductive domains were useful as a way to identify additional issues to investigate further. Both analysis techniques resulted in a comprehensive list of barriers to vaccination that would not have been achieved using either approach alone. We recommend a hybrid approach combining TDF with broader frameworks, for future researchers conducting evidence syntheses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34526141
doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00202-0
pii: 10.1186/s43058-021-00202-0
pmc: PMC8442360
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 1164200

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Diabet Med. 2018 Oct;35(10):1308-1319
pubmed: 29790594
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 6;15(1):44
pubmed: 32624002
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):979-993
pubmed: 30707299
Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):2
pubmed: 28057049
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 May 29;27(4):929-944
pubmed: 31141447
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 03;12:114
pubmed: 22862833
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 28;11(1):157
pubmed: 27894313
Implement Sci. 2019 May 7;14(1):49
pubmed: 31064375
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):130
pubmed: 30348165
Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(1):1-7
pubmed: 25053004
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Aug 1;74(8):2139-2152
pubmed: 31002336
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):195
pubmed: 32028932

Auteurs

Carissa Bonner (C)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. carissa.bonner@sydney.edu.au.

Jane Tuckerman (J)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Jessica Kaufman (J)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Daniel Costa (D)

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

David N Durrheim (DN)

School of Medicine and Public Heatlh, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Lyndal Trevena (L)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Susan Thomas (S)

School of Medicine and Public Heatlh, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Margie Danchin (M)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of General Medicine, Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Classifications MeSH